Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 73

1.

Persuasive images in popular science: Testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility.

Gruber D, Dickerson JA.

Public Underst Sci. 2012 Nov;21(8):938-48. doi: 10.1177/0963662512454072. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

PMID:
23832746
2.

Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning.

McCabe DP, Castel AD.

Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):343-52. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

PMID:
17803985
3.

Look again: effects of brain images and mind-brain dualism on lay evaluations of research.

Hook CJ, Farah MJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1397-405. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00407. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

PMID:
23879877
4.

Different clues from different views: the role of image format in public perceptions of neuroimaging results.

Keehner M, Mayberry L, Fischer MH.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):422-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0048-7.

PMID:
21327381
5.

The unbearable lightness of health science reporting: a week examining Italian print media.

Iaboli L, Caselli L, Filice A, Russi G, Belletti E.

PLoS One. 2010 Mar 24;5(3):e9829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009829.

6.

The cognitive science of fiction.

Oatley K.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;3(4):425-30. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1185. Epub 2012 May 3.

PMID:
26301527
7.

Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists' credibility.

Jensen JD, Hurley RJ.

Public Underst Sci. 2012 Aug;21(6):689-704. doi: 10.1177/0963662510387759. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

PMID:
23832155
8.

Consider the source: persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility.

Smith CT, De Houwer J, Nosek BA.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Feb;39(2):193-205. doi: 10.1177/0146167212472374.

PMID:
23386656
9.

Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.

Sparks JR, Rapp DN.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):230-47. doi: 10.1037/a0021331.

PMID:
21244116
10.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.

Kulich R, Maciewicz R, Scrivani SJ.

Pain Med. 2009 Mar;10(2):373-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00567.x. Epub 2009 Feb 25. Review. Erratum in: Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;10(4):775.

PMID:
19254335
11.

Are two readers more reliable than one? A study of upper neck ligament scoring on magnetic resonance images.

Espeland A, Vetti N, Kråkenes J.

BMC Med Imaging. 2013 Jan 17;13:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-13-4.

12.

Affective and executive network processing associated with persuasive antidrug messages.

Ramsay IS, Yzer MC, Luciana M, Vohs KD, MacDonald AW 3rd.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jul;25(7):1136-47. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00391. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23530896
13.

Evidence for a neural correlate of a framing effect: bias-specific activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during credibility judgments.

Deppe M, Schwindt W, Krämer J, Kugel H, Plassmann H, Kenning P, Ringelstein EB.

Brain Res Bull. 2005 Nov 15;67(5):413-21. Epub 2005 Jul 25.

PMID:
16216688
14.

Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers.

Margolis J.

Science. 1967 Mar 10;155(3767):1213-9.

PMID:
5335153
15.

Scientific journals and their authors' financial interests: a pilot study.

Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS, Stott P, Kyle G.

Psychother Psychosom. 1998 Jul-Oct;67(4-5):194-201.

PMID:
9693346
16.

Mammography messages in popular media: implications for patient expectations and shared clinical decision-making.

Dobias KS, Moyer CA, McAchran SE, Katz SJ, Sonnad SS.

Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):127-35. Review.

PMID:
11359543
17.

Persuasion: From Single to Multiple to Metacognitive Processes.

Petty RE, Briñol P.

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;3(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00071.x.

PMID:
26158880
18.

Variability in fMRI: a re-examination of inter-session differences.

Smith SM, Beckmann CF, Ramnani N, Woolrich MW, Bannister PR, Jenkinson M, Matthews PM, McGonigle DJ.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Mar;24(3):248-57.

PMID:
15654698
19.

An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press.

Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Jaeschke R, Heddle N, Keller J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Sep;46(9):987-1001.

PMID:
8263584
20.

A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications-clinical benefits and future directions.

Müller H, Michoux N, Bandon D, Geissbuhler A.

Int J Med Inform. 2004 Feb;73(1):1-23. Review. Erratum in: Int J Med Inform. 2009 Sep;78(9):638.

PMID:
15036075

Supplemental Content

Support Center