Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

Applicability of two different validated models to predict axillary non-sentinel lymph node status by sentinel node biopsy in a single Italian center.

Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Giacomuzzi F, Angione V, Carbone A, Petri R, Bernardi S.

Breast Cancer. 2015 Jul;22(4):350-5. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0485-z. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

PMID:
23832256
2.

Validation of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients an international comparison.

Kuo YL, Chen WC, Yao WJ, Cheng L, Hsu HP, Lai HW, Kuo SJ, Chen DR, Chang TW.

Int J Surg. 2013;11(7):538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 22.

3.

[Comparison of three models to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective study of 77 patients].

Terrier C, Tariel O, Coutant C, De Saint Hilaire P, Devouassoux M, Rudigoz RC, Dubernard G.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 May;41(3):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 30. French.

4.

Predictive probability of four different breast cancer nomograms for nonsentinel axillary lymph node metastasis in positive sentinel node biopsy.

Gur AS, Unal B, Johnson R, Ahrendt G, Bonaventura M, Gordon P, Soran A.

J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.029. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

PMID:
19228534
5.

Risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis and validation study of the MSKCC nomogram in breast cancer patients.

Qiu PF, Liu JJ, Wang YS, Yang GR, Liu YB, Sun X, Wang CJ, Zhang ZP.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov;42(11):1002-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys150.

PMID:
23100610
6.

Sentinel lymph node micrometastasis and risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis: validation of two breast cancer nomograms.

D'Eredità G, Troilo VL, Giardina C, Napoli A, Rubini G, Fischetti F, Berardi T.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;10(6):445-51. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2010.n.058.

PMID:
21147687
7.

Validation of breast cancer nomograms for predicting the non-sentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a multi-center study.

Gur AS, Unal B, Ozbek U, Ozmen V, Aydogan F, Gokgoz S, Gulluoglu BM, Aksaz E, Ozbas S, Baskan S, Koyuncu A, Soran A; Turkish Federation of Breast Disease Associations Protocol MF08-01 investigators.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan;36(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Jun 16.

PMID:
19535217
8.

Axillary nodal metastases in Italian early breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node: can axillary node dissection be avoided by using predictive nomograms?

Biolchini F, Vicentini M, Di Felice E, Giovanardi F, Antonio L, Giorgi Rossi P, Annessi V.

Tumori. 2015 May-Jun;101(3):298-305. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000281. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

PMID:
25838248
9.
10.

Comparative validation of online nomograms for predicting nonsentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer.

Hessman CJ, Naik AM, Kearney NM, Jensen AJ, Diggs BS, Troxell ML, Vetto JT.

Arch Surg. 2011 Sep;146(9):1035-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.201.

PMID:
21931000
11.

Three models for predicting the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Sasada T, Kataoka T, Shigematsu H, Masumoto N, Kadoya T, Okada M, Ohdan H.

Breast Cancer. 2014 Sep;21(5):571-5. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0435-1. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

PMID:
23307473
12.

Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node: validation of five nomograms and development of a new predictive model.

Lombardi A, Maggi S, Lo Russo M, Scopinaro F, Di Stefano D, Pittau MG, Tiberi S, Amanti C.

Tumori. 2011 Nov-Dec;97(6):749-55. doi: 10.1700/1018.11092.

13.

Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy.

Scomersi S, Torelli L, Zanconati F, Tonutti M, Dore F, Bortul M.

Ann Ital Chir. 2012 Nov-Dec;83(6):461-8.

PMID:
23110902
14.

Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy.

Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V, Charitansky H, Laki F, Falcou MC, Benamor M, Freneaux P, Salmon RJ; Institut Curie Breast Cancer Study Group, Sigal-Zafrani B.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Aug;14(8):2195-201. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

PMID:
17294071
15.

Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy: validation of the MSKCC breast nomogram.

van la Parra RF, Ernst MF, Bevilacqua JL, Mol SJ, Van Zee KJ, Broekman JM, Bosscha K.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1128-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0359-y. Epub 2009 Feb 28.

PMID:
19252954
16.

Axillary lymph node dissection in the case of sentinel lymph node micrometastatic invasion: evaluation of three predictive models.

Orsoni M, Clerc J, Golfier F, Cortet M, Raudrant D, Krauth JS.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Oct;158(2):334-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

PMID:
21669485
17.

[Risk factors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis and performance of MSKCC nomogramin breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node].

Huang J, Chen X, Fei X, Huang O, Wu J, Zong Y, Zhu L, He J, Chen W, Li Y, Shen K.

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec 1;53(12):941-6. Chinese.

PMID:
26850667
18.
19.

Validation of online calculators to predict the non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients.

Tanaka S, Sato N, Fujioka H, Takahashi Y, Kimura K, Iwamoto M.

Surg Today. 2013 Feb;43(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0229-2. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

PMID:
22722328
20.

Models for predicting non-sentinel lymph node positivity in sentinel node positive breast cancer: the importance of scoring system.

Unal B, Gur AS, Kayiran O, Johnson R, Ahrendt G, Bonaventura M, Soran A.

Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Nov;62(11):1785-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01887.x. Review.

PMID:
19143863

Supplemental Content

Support Center