Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 92

1.

A new method for the analysis of soft tissues with data acquired under field conditions.

Sonnweber RS, Stobbe N, Zavala Romero O, Slice DE, Fieder M, Wallner B.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e67521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067521. Print 2013.

2.

Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.

Walker A, Liney G, Holloway L, Dowling J, Rivest-Henault D, Metcalfe P.

Med Phys. 2015 Apr;42(4):1982-91. doi: 10.1118/1.4915920.

PMID:
25832089
3.

Anatomical landmarks for registration of experimental image data to volumetric rodent brain atlasing templates.

Sergejeva M, Papp EA, Bakker R, Gaudnek MA, Okamura-Oho Y, Boline J, Bjaalie JG, Hess A.

J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Jan 30;240:161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

PMID:
25445058
4.
5.

Three-dimensional quantification of color-marked occlusal paths on anatomically oriented casts.

Dirksen D, Runte C, Böröcz Z, Thomas C, von Bally G, Bollmann F.

J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):156-61.

PMID:
11208205
6.

An MRI based average macaque monkey stereotaxic atlas and space (MNI monkey space).

Frey S, Pandya DN, Chakravarty MM, Bailey L, Petrides M, Collins DL.

Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.040. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

PMID:
21256229
7.

Three-dimensional methodology for photogrammetric acquisition of the soft tissues of the face: a new clinical-instrumental protocol.

Deli R, Galantucci LM, Laino A, D'Alessio R, Di Gioia E, Savastano C, Lavecchia F, Percoco G.

Prog Orthod. 2013 Sep 20;14:32. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-32.

8.

Global localization of 3D anatomical structures by pre-filtered Hough forests and discrete optimization.

Donner R, Menze BH, Bischof H, Langs G.

Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec;17(8):1304-14. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 17.

9.
10.
11.

An analytical tool that quantifies cellular morphology changes from three-dimensional fluorescence images.

Haass-Koffler CL, Naeemuddin M, Bartlett SE.

J Vis Exp. 2012 Aug 31;(66):e4233. doi: 10.3791/4233.

12.

Improving accuracy of XRII image distortion correction using a new hybrid image processing method: performance assessment.

Yan S, Nie S, Zheng B.

Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5921-32. doi: 10.1118/1.3644846.

PMID:
22047357
13.

Robust methods for automatic image-to-world registration in cone-beam CT interventional guidance.

Dang H, Otake Y, Schafer S, Stayman JW, Kleinszig G, Siewerdsen JH.

Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):6484-98. doi: 10.1118/1.4754589.

15.

Development of a three-dimensional hand model using 3D stereophotogrammetry: Evaluation of landmark reproducibility.

Hoevenaren IA, Maal TJ, Krikken E, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Ulrich DJ.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 May;68(5):709-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.025. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

PMID:
25665488
16.

[Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics].

Pavlinov IIa, Mikeshina NG.

Zh Obshch Biol. 2002 Nov-Dec;63(6):473-93. Review. Russian.

PMID:
12510587
17.

A 3D ultrasound scanning system for image guided liver interventions.

Neshat H, Cool DW, Barker K, Gardi L, Kakani N, Fenster A.

Med Phys. 2013 Nov;40(11):112903. doi: 10.1118/1.4824326.

PMID:
24320470
18.

The Accuracy of Conformation of a Generic Surface Mesh for the Analysis of Facial Soft Tissue Changes.

Cheung MY, Almukhtar A, Keeling A, Hsung TC, Ju X, McDonald J, Ayoub A, Khambay BS.

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 19;11(4):e0152381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152381. eCollection 2016.

19.

Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.

Oshagh M, Shahidi SH, Danaei SH.

Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):98-103. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114958.

20.

Measuring facial swelling using three-dimensional imaging.

Bowskill J, Baldock C, Booth PW.

Med Inform (Lond). 1997 Apr-Jun;22(2):155-64.

PMID:
9304561

Supplemental Content

Support Center