Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132

1.

Predicting scientists' participation in public life.

Besley JC, Oh SH, Nisbet M.

Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):971-87. doi: 10.1177/0963662512459315. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23825262
2.

How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.

Besley JC, Nisbet M.

Public Underst Sci. 2013 Aug;22(6):644-59. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418743. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

PMID:
23885050
3.

How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach.

Ecklund EH, James SA, Lincoln AE.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036240. Epub 2012 May 9.

4.

Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.

Dudo A, Besley JC.

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.

5.

The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?

Simis MJ, Madden H, Cacciatore MA, Yeo SK.

Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749.

PMID:
27117768
6.

On being a (modern) scientist: risks of public engagement in the UK interspecies embryo debate.

Porter J, Williams C, Wainwright S, Cribb A.

New Genet Soc. 2012 Dec;31(4):408-423. Epub 2012 May 22.

7.

Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists' credibility.

Jensen JD, Hurley RJ.

Public Underst Sci. 2012 Aug;21(6):689-704. doi: 10.1177/0963662510387759. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

PMID:
23832155
8.

Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.

Anderson MS, Martinson BC, De Vries R.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):3-14. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.

PMID:
19385804
9.

Scientists' and science writers' experiences reporting genetic discoveries: toward an ethic of trust in science journalism.

Geller G, Bernhardt BA, Gardner M, Rodgers J, Holtzman NA.

Genet Med. 2005 Mar;7(3):198-205.

PMID:
15775756
10.

Scientists' views about communication objectives.

Besley JC, Dudo A, Yuan S.

Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug 1:963662517728478. doi: 10.1177/0963662517728478. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28841818
11.

Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.

Schor EL; American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family.

Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

PMID:
12777595
12.

Geneticists' views on science policy formation and public outreach.

Mathews DJ, Kalfoglou A, Hudson K.

Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Aug 30;137(2):161-9.

PMID:
16082707
13.
14.

The meanings of science: conversations with geneticists.

Egorova Y.

Health Care Anal. 2007 Mar;15(1):51-8.

PMID:
17373132
15.

A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role and impact on scientists.

McClain C, Neeley L.

Version 2. F1000Res. 2014 Dec 9 [revised 2015 Jan 1];3:300. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.5918.2. eCollection 2014.

16.

Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.

Braun M, Starkbaum J, Dabrock P.

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145033. eCollection 2015.

17.

Scientists' opinions on the global status and management of biological diversity.

Rudd MA.

Conserv Biol. 2011 Dec;25(6):1165-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01772.x.

PMID:
22070272
18.

Research in clinical laboratory science: professionals' involvement.

Laudicina R, Fenn JP, Freeman V, McCoy C, McLane MA, Mundt L, Polancic J, Randolph T, Shanahan K.

Clin Lab Sci. 2011 Fall;24(4):235-42.

PMID:
22288223
19.

Scientific authority in policy contexts: Public attitudes about environmental scientists, medical researchers, and economists.

O'Brien TL.

Public Underst Sci. 2013 Oct;22(7):799-816. doi: 10.1177/0963662511435054. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

PMID:
24048622
20.

Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy.

Barke RP, Jenkins-Smith HC.

Risk Anal. 1993 Aug;13(4):425-39.

PMID:
8234951

Supplemental Content

Support Center