Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 494

2.

Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.

Hong J, Yu Z, Jiang C, Zhou X, Liu Z, Sun X, Xu J.

Optom Vis Sci. 2015 May;92(5):589-95. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000575.

PMID:
25871871
3.

Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Mahmoud AM, Yoon EY, Roberts CJ, Pepose JS.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;35(10):1774-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.041.

PMID:
19781475
5.

Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.

Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):39-47. Epub 2006 Oct 20.

PMID:
17188041
6.

Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Chen MC, Lee N, Bourla N, Hamilton DR.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;34(11):1886-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.035.

PMID:
19006734
8.

Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Li H, Wang Y, Dou R, Wei P, Zhang J, Zhao W, Li L.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Aug 1;57(10):4180-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19615.

PMID:
27548888
9.

Changes in ocular biomechanics after femtosecond laser creation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap.

Leccisotti A, Fields SV, Moore J, Shah S, Moore TC.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.047.

PMID:
26948787
10.

Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK.

Chen S, Chen D, Wang J, Lu F, Wang Q, Qu J.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;26(4):279-88. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100218-04. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

PMID:
20415324
11.

Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.

Pedersen IB, Bak-Nielsen S, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;252(8):1329-35. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2667-6. Epub 2014 May 27.

PMID:
24862302
12.

Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study.

Schallhorn JM, Schallhorn SC, Ou Y.

Ophthalmology. 2015 Mar;122(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.033. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

PMID:
25444636
13.

Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.

Zare M, Feizi S, Azimzadeh A, Esfandiari H.

Curr Eye Res. 2012 Jun;37(6):457-62. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.660594.

PMID:
22577762
14.

Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.

Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, Bourla N.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2049-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.021.

PMID:
19027558
15.

Intraocular pressure instrument reading comparisons after LASIK.

Fan F, Li C, Li Y, Duan X, Pan D.

Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jul;88(7):850-4. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821909df.

PMID:
21499165
16.

Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.

Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):840-849.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.032. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

PMID:
22310080
17.

Change in biomechanical parameters after flap creation using the Intralase femtosecond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation.

Uzbek AK, Kamburo─člu G, Mahmoud AM, Roberts CJ.

Curr Eye Res. 2011 Jul;36(7):614-9. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.546952.

PMID:
21657826
20.

Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X.

J Refract Surg. 2014 May;30(5):310-8.

PMID:
24904933

Supplemental Content

Support Center