Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 181

1.

Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.

Vilmann P, Săftoiu A, Hollerbach S, Skov BG, Linnemann D, Popescu CF, Wellmann A, Gorunescu F, Clementsen P, Freund U, Flemming P, Hassan H, Gheonea DI, Streba L, Ioncică AM, Streba CT.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;48(7):877-83. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.799222.

PMID:
23795663
2.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.

Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9.

3.

A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions.

Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Azzolini F, Iori V, Cavina M, Sereni G, Decembrino F, Gallo C, Tamagnini I, Valli R, Piana S, Campari C, Gardini G, Sassatelli R.

Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):709-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256482.

PMID:
21611946
4.

A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses.

Lee JK, Lee KT, Choi ER, Jang TH, Jang KT, Lee JK, Lee KH.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;48(6):752-7. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.786127.

PMID:
23600919
5.

Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.

Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1392.

6.

Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.

Gimeno-García AZ, Elwassief A, Paquin SC, Gariépy G, Sahai AV.

Dig Endosc. 2014 May;26(3):467-73.

PMID:
24877242
7.

Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.

Ramesh J, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Eltoum I, Frost A, Hasan MK, Logue A, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S.

Pancreas. 2015 Jan;44(1):128-33. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000217. Retraction in: Pancreas. 2016 Jan;45(1):160.

8.

Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.

Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ, Yamamoto N, Hamada T, Uchino R, Mizuno S, Miyabayashi K, Yamamoto K, Kawakubo K, Kogure H, Sasaki T, Hirano K, Tanaka M, Tada M, Fukayama M, Koike K.

Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Jul;59(7):1578-85. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-3019-9.

PMID:
24429514
9.

"Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.

Attam R, Arain MA, Bloechl SJ, Trikudanathan G, Munigala S, Bakman Y, Singh M, Wallace T, Henderson JB, Catalano MF, Guda NM.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.023.

PMID:
25733127
10.

Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Abe Y, Kawakami H, Oba K, Hayashi T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Isayama H, Ishiwatari H, Doi S, Nakashima M, Yamamoto N, Kuwatani M, Mitsuhashi T, Hasegawa T, Hirose Y, Yamada T, Tanaka M, Sakamoto N; Japan EUS-FNA Stylet Study Group..

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):837-844.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1898.

PMID:
25936452
11.

Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.

Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, Kim HK, Cho JW, Lee TH, Moon JS; Korean EUS Study Group..

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;49(3):347-54. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.867361.

PMID:
24325591
12.

Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia AP, Adler DG, Factor RE.

Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Apr;58(4):1026-34. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2439-2. Review.

PMID:
23086117
13.

Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.

Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, Noda K, Chikugo T, Dote K, Takeyama Y, Das K, Yamao K, Kudo M.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;24(3):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05636.x.

PMID:
19032453
14.

Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study.

Hucl T, Wee E, Anuradha S, Gupta R, Ramchandani M, Rakesh K, Shrestha R, Reddy DN, Lakhtakia S.

Endoscopy. 2013 Oct;45(10):792-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344217.

PMID:
24068588
15.

The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses.

Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, Eum JB, Moon SH, Park DY, Seo DW, Lee SK, Jang SJ, Yun SC, Kim MH.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;105(8):1739-45. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.108.

PMID:
20216532
16.
17.

High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.

Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JB, Park DH, Zhang Z, Gu M, Lee JG, Chang KJ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.001.

PMID:
23433596
18.

EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.

Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BG, Wang AY, Stelow EB, Shami VM.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2014 Sep;42(9):751-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.23116.

PMID:
24550162
19.

Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.

Rong L, Kida M, Yamauchi H, Okuwaki K, Miyazawa S, Iwai T, Kikuchi H, Watanabe M, Imaizumi H, Koizumi W.

Dig Endosc. 2012 Sep;24(5):358-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01243.x.

PMID:
22925290
20.

High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Kudo T, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Inoue H, Katanuma A, Kawakubo K, Ishiwatari H, Doi S, Yamada R, Maguchi H, Isayama H, Mitsuhashi T, Sakamoto N; Japan EUS-FNA Negative Pressure Suction Study Group..

Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1030-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.012.

PMID:
24890422

Supplemental Content

Support Center