Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 95

1.

The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.

West RW, Piegorsch WW, Peña EA, An L, Wu W, Wickens AA, Xiong H, Chen W.

Environmetrics. 2012 Dec;23(8):706-716.

2.

Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Piegorsch WW, Xiong H, Bhattacharya RN, Lin L.

Risk Anal. 2014 Jan;34(1):135-51. doi: 10.1111/risa.12066. Epub 2013 May 17.

3.

Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.

Piegorsch WW, An L, Wickens AA, West RW, Peña EA, Wu W.

Environmetrics. 2013 May 1;24(3):143-157.

4.

Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Piegorsch WW, Xiong H, Bhattacharya RN, Lin L.

Environmetrics. 2012 Dec 1;23(8):717-728.

5.

Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.

Zhu Y, Wang T, Jelsovsky JZ.

Risk Anal. 2007 Apr;27(2):447-65.

PMID:
17511711
6.

Bayesian model-averaged benchmark dose analysis via reparameterized quantal-response models.

Fang Q, Piegorsch WW, Simmons SJ, Li X, Chen C, Wang Y.

Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):1168-75. doi: 10.1111/biom.12340. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

PMID:
26102570
7.

Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.

Shipp AM, Gentry PR, Lawrence G, Van Landingham C, Covington T, Clewell HJ, Gribben K, Crump K.

Toxicol Ind Health. 2000 Nov;16(9-10):335-438. Review.

PMID:
11762928
8.

Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.

Shao K, Gift JS.

Risk Anal. 2014 Jan;34(1):101-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.12078. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

PMID:
23758102
9.

Evaluation of the benchmark dose method for dichotomous data: model dependence and model selection.

Sand S, Filipsson AF, Victorin K.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Oct;36(2):184-97.

PMID:
12460753
10.
11.

Potential uncertainty reduction in model-averaged benchmark dose estimates informed by an additional dose study.

Shao K, Small MJ.

Risk Anal. 2011 Oct;31(10):1561-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01595.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

PMID:
21388425
12.

A benchmark dose analysis for sodium monofluoroacetate (1080) using dichotomous toxicity data.

Foronda NM, Fowles J, Smith N, Taylor M, Temple W.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;47(1):84-9. Epub 2006 Sep 11.

PMID:
16965845
13.

Current modeling practice may lead to falsely high benchmark dose estimates.

Ringblom J, Johanson G, Öberg M.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;69(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

14.

Application of benchmark dose for occupational epidemiology in lead exposure.

Lin T, Xiao-Ting L, Ai G, Qiu-Ying L, Tai-Yi J.

Toxicol Mech Methods. 2008;18(4):363-7. doi: 10.1080/15376510701623888.

PMID:
20020903
15.

Nonparametric Bayesian methods for benchmark dose estimation.

Guha N, Roy A, Kopylev L, Fox J, Spassova M, White P.

Risk Anal. 2013 Sep;33(9):1608-19. doi: 10.1111/risa.12004. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

PMID:
23339666
16.

Benchmark dose profiles for joint-action quantal data in quantitative risk assessment.

Deutsch RC, Piegorsch WW.

Biometrics. 2012 Dec;68(4):1313-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01811.x.

17.

Benchmark dose profiles for joint-action continuous data in quantitative risk assessment.

Deutsch RC, Piegorsch WW.

Biom J. 2013 Sep;55(5):741-54. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201300037. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

PMID:
23852573
18.

Parameters of a dose-response model are on the boundary: what happens with BMDL?

Kopylev L, Fox J.

Risk Anal. 2009 Jan;29(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01125.x. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

PMID:
18808395
19.

Evaluation of the benchmark dose for point of departure determination for a variety of chemical classes in applied regulatory settings.

Izadi H, Grundy JE, Bose R.

Risk Anal. 2012 May;32(5):830-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01732.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

PMID:
22126138
20.

Variation in benchmark dose (BMD) and the 95% lower confidence limit of benchmark dose (BMDL) among general Japanese populations with no anthropogenic exposure to cadmium.

Sakuragi S, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T, Moriguchi J, Ohashi F, Fukui Y, Ikeda M.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Nov;85(8):941-50. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0734-z. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

PMID:
22270387

Supplemental Content

Support Center