Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 124

1.

Pediatric cardiovascular interventional devices: effect on CMR images at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Khan SN, Rapacchi S, Levi DS, Finn JP.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jun 19;15:54. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-54.

2.

Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents.

Wang Y, Truong TN, Yen C, Bilecen D, Watts R, Trost DW, Prince MR.

Magn Reson Med. 2003 May;49(5):972-6.

3.

Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: in vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices.

Kahlert P, Eggebrecht H, Plicht B, Kraff O, McDougall I, Decker B, Erbel R, Ladd ME, Quick HH.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Oct 13;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-58.

4.

[Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].

Graf H, Klemm T, Lauer UA, Duda S, Claussen CD, Schick F.

Rofo. 2003 Dec;175(12):1711-9. German.

PMID:
14661144
5.

High-field MR imaging in pediatric congenital heart disease: initial results.

Nguyen KL, Khan SN, Moriarty JM, Mohajer K, Renella P, Satou G, Ayad I, Patel S, Boechat MI, Finn JP.

Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Jan;45(1):42-54. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3093-y. Epub 2014 Aug 3.

6.

SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.

Ai T, Padua A, Goerner F, Nittka M, Gugala Z, Jadhav S, Trelles M, Johnson RF, Lindsey RW, Li X, Runge VM.

Invest Radiol. 2012 May;47(5):267-76. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318240a919.

PMID:
22266987
7.

Initial in vivo experience with a novel type of MR-safe pushable coils for MR-guided embolizations.

Homagk AK, Umathum R, Bock M, Hallscheidt P.

Invest Radiol. 2013 Jun;48(6):485-91. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182856a6f.

PMID:
23442773
8.

Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.

Zou YF, Chu B, Wang CB, Hu ZY.

Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

PMID:
25544555
9.

Optimized protocols for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with thoracic metallic implants.

Olivieri LJ, Cross RR, O'Brien KE, Ratnayaka K, Hansen MS.

Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Sep;45(10):1455-64. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3366-0. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

PMID:
26040508
10.

Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.

Vaccaro AR, Chesnut RM, Scuderi G, Healy JF, Massie JB, Garfin SR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 1;19(11):1237-42.

PMID:
8073315
11.

[High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].

Sommer T, Maintz D, Schmiedel A, Hackenbroch M, Hofer U, Urbach H, Pavlidis C, Träber F, Schild H, Höher M.

Rofo. 2004 May;176(5):731-8. German.

PMID:
15122473
12.

Comparison of 15 different stents in superficial femoral arteries by high resolution MRI ex vivo and in vivo.

Adams GJ, Baltazar U, Karmonik C, Bordelon C, Lin PH, Bush RL, Lumsden AB, Morrisett JD.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jul;22(1):125-35.

PMID:
15971171
13.

MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths.

Klemm T, Duda S, Machann J, Seekamp-Rahn K, Schnieder L, Claussen CD, Schick F.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Oct;12(4):606-15.

PMID:
11042644
14.

[Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].

Reinhardt J, Nguyen-Trong TH, Hähnel S, Bellemann ME, Heiland S.

Z Med Phys. 2009;19(4):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 25. German.

PMID:
19995528
15.

Use of a 1.0 Tesla open scanner for evaluation of pediatric and congenital heart disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Lu JC, Nielsen JC, Morowitz L, Musani M, Ghadimi Mahani M, Agarwal PP, Ibrahim el-SH, Dorfman AL.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 May 25;17:39. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0144-y.

16.

Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and artifacts of cardiac occluders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.

Shellock FG, Morisoli SM.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994 Mar-Apr;4(2):213-5.

PMID:
8180463
17.

Influence of blood-pool contrast media on MR imaging and flow measurements in the presence of pulmonary arterial stents in swine.

Kuehne T, Saeed M, Moore P, Gleason K, Reddy G, Teitel D, Higgins CB.

Radiology. 2002 May;223(2):439-45.

PMID:
11997550
18.

[Magnetic resonance angiography of stents].

Drevet D, Beck F, Streichenberger T, Liebgott M, Russier S, Célarier C, Champion M, Joffre P.

J Radiol. 2000 Sep;81(9):965-70. French.

19.

Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent.

Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Mahnken A, Stuber M, Kölker C, Nguyen TH, Günther RW, Buecker A.

Circulation. 2005 Mar 1;111(8):1019-26. Epub 2005 Feb 21.

20.

MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.

Bartels LW, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Mar;12(3):365-71.

PMID:
11287516

Supplemental Content

Support Center