Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 169

1.

Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.

Beste C, Yildiz A, Meissner TW, Wolf OT.

Behav Brain Res. 2013 Sep 1;252:260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

PMID:
23769959
2.

Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.

Schubert T, Fischer R, Stelzel C.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):376-97. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.376.

PMID:
18377177
3.

Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.

Maslovat D, Chua R, Spencer HC, Forgaard CJ, Carlsen AN, Franks IM.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Nov;144(3):481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

PMID:
24076331
4.

Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study.

Hesselmann G, Flandin G, Dehaene S.

Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1608-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.017. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

PMID:
21397701
5.

Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.

Franz EA, Sebastian A, Hust C, Norris T.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):398-412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.398.

PMID:
18377178
6.

On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.

Miller J, Ulrich R, Rolke B.

Cogn Psychol. 2009 May;58(3):273-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

PMID:
19281972
7.

Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.

Ruiz Fernández S, Leonhard T, Rolke B, Ulrich R.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 May;137(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

PMID:
21427007
8.

Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?

Leonhard T, Fernández SR, Ulrich R, Miller J.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):115-36. doi: 10.1037/a0019238.

PMID:
20718575
9.

The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?

Bratzke D, Rolke B, Ulrich R.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1413-26. doi: 10.1037/a0015874.

PMID:
19803646
10.

Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.

Thomson SJ, Watter S.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):934-53. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0457-6.

PMID:
23592183
11.

Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.

Bryce D, Bratzke D.

Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:254-67. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

PMID:
24956469
12.

Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.

Göthe K, Oberauer K, Kliegl R.

Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.

PMID:
26878090
13.

The socially evaluated cold-pressor test (SECPT) for groups: effects of repeated administration of a combined physiological and psychological stressor.

Minkley N, Schröder TP, Wolf OT, Kirchner WH.

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Jul;45:119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

PMID:
24845183
14.

When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.

Besner D, Reynolds M, O'Malley S.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Nov;62(11):2222-34. doi: 10.1080/17470210902747187. Epub 2009 Apr 11.

PMID:
19370482
15.

Influence of acute stress on spatial tasks in humans.

Richardson AE, VanderKaay Tomasulo MM.

Physiol Behav. 2011 Jul 6;103(5):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

PMID:
21440564
16.

Better not to deal with two tasks at the same time when stressed? Acute psychosocial stress reduces task shielding in dual-task performance.

Plessow F, Schade S, Kirschbaum C, Fischer R.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Sep;12(3):557-70. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0098-6.

PMID:
22684896
17.

The psychological refractory period: evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing.

Allen PA, Smith AF, Vires-Collins H, Sperry S.

Psychol Aging. 1998 Jun;13(2):218-29.

PMID:
9640583
18.

Dual-task performance is differentially modulated by rewards and punishments.

Yildiz A, Chmielewski W, Beste C.

Behav Brain Res. 2013 Aug 1;250:304-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 May 13.

PMID:
23680164
19.

Stress induces a functional asymmetry in an emotional attention task.

Brüne M, Nadolny N, Güntürkün O, Wolf OT.

Cogn Emot. 2013;27(3):558-66. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.726211. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

PMID:
23005338
20.

Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Yildiz A, Beste C.

Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Nov;220(6):3131-42. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0847-0. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

PMID:
25017192

Supplemental Content

Support Center