Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Quantifying the characteristics of the acetabulum and proximal femur using a semi-automated hip morphology software programme (SHIPS).

Thiagarajah S, Macinnes S, Yang L, Doherty M, Wilkinson JM.

Hip Int. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):330-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000022. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

PMID:
23760748
2.

Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of a new method of computer measurement of joint space width in hip osteoarthritis. Performance of three radiographic views obtained at a 3-year interval.

Conrozier T, Brandt K, Piperno M, Mathieu P, Merle-Vincent F, Vignon E.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jul;17(7):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 24.

3.

Effect of changes in pelvic tilt on range of motion to impingement and radiographic parameters of acetabular morphologic characteristics.

Ross JR, Nepple JJ, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Larson CM, Bedi A.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2402-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541229. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

PMID:
25060073
4.

2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements.

Davda K, Smyth N, Cobb JP, Hart AJ.

Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):485-90. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1017791. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

5.

Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem.

Kosiyatrakul A, Luenam S, Chotanaphuti T.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Dec;92 Suppl 6:S128-33.

PMID:
20120674
6.

Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated.

Tannast M, Mistry S, Steppacher SD, Reichenbach S, Langlotz F, Siebenrock KA, Zheng G.

J Orthop Res. 2008 Sep;26(9):1199-205. doi: 10.1002/jor.20653.

7.

Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?

Craiovan B, Weber M, Worlicek M, Schneider M, Springorum HR, Zeman F, Grifka J, Renkawitz T.

Rofo. 2016 Jun;188(6):574-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104205. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

8.

Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: Analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility.

Thelen T, Thelen P, Demezon H, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

PMID:
28025151
9.

Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA.

Zheng G, von Recum J, Nolte LP, Grützner PA, Steppacher SD, Franke J.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Mar;7(2):225-31. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0644-7. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

PMID:
21792672
10.

Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Worlicek M, Weber M, Zeman F, Wörner M, Schneider M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T, Craiovan B.

Rofo. 2016 Aug;188(8):763-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106975. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

11.

Statistical model-based segmentation of the proximal femur in digital antero-posterior (AP) pelvic radiographs.

Xie W, Franke J, Chen C, Grützner PA, Schumann S, Nolte LP, Zheng G.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Mar;9(2):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0932-5. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

PMID:
23900851
12.

Assessment of cup orientation in hip resurfacing: a comparison of TraumaCad and computed tomography.

Westacott DJ, McArthur J, King RJ, Foguet P.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Apr 11;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-8.

13.

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements.

Nepple JJ, Martell JM, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Millis MB, Podeszwa DA, Sucato DJ, Sink EL, Clohisy JC; ANCHOR Study Group.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2393-401. doi: 10.1177/0363546514542797. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

PMID:
25134816
14.

Definition of a quantitative measurement method for acetabular version in a plain radiograph in the healthy adult hip.

Özçelik A, Akalın Y, Çalışır C, İnan U, Ömeroğlu H.

Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2015;26(1):2-5. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2015.02.

15.

Functional acetabular orientation varies between supine and standing radiographs: implications for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Ross JR, Tannenbaum EP, Nepple JJ, Kelly BT, Larson CM, Bedi A.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1267-73. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4104-x.

16.

Reliability of overcoverage parameters with varying morphologic pincer features: comparison of EOS® and radiography.

Monazzam S, Agashe M, Hosalkar HS.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2578-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3001-z. Epub 2013 May 9.

17.

Three Patterns of Acetabular Deficiency Are Common in Young Adult Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia.

Nepple JJ, Wells J, Ross JR, Bedi A, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5150-3.

PMID:
27830486
18.

New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone.

Journé A, Sadaka J, Bélicourt C, Sautet A.

Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2205-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1650-2. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

19.

Novel CT-based three-dimensional software improves the characterization of cam morphology.

Milone MT, Bedi A, Poultsides L, Magennis E, Byrd JW, Larson CM, Kelly BT.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2484-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2809-x.

20.

[Reliability of digital measurement of acetabular index in hip dysplasia to the time children start walking].

Dornacher D, Cakir B, Reichel H, Nelitz M.

Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Mar-Apr;146(2):246-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038321. German.

PMID:
18404590

Supplemental Content

Support Center