Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 128

1.

Guidelines in cardiac clinical practice: evaluation of their methodological quality using the AGREE II instrument.

Sabharwal S, Patel V, Nijjer SS, Kirresh A, Darzi A, Chambers JC, Malik I, Kooner JS, Athanasiou T.

J R Soc Med. 2013 Aug;106(8):315-22. doi: 10.1177/0141076813486261. Epub 2013 May 28. Review.

2.

Quality assessment of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery.

Sabharwal S, Gauher S, Kyriacou S, Patel V, Holloway I, Athanasiou T.

Bone Joint J. 2014 Jan;96-B(1):19-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.32943. Review.

PMID:
24395305
3.

Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.

Huang M, Zhou X.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1089-94. doi: 10.1111/jep.12474. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

PMID:
26507460
4.
5.
6.

Quality of stroke rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines.

Hurdowar A, Graham ID, Bayley M, Harrison M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Bhogal S.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):657-64.

PMID:
17683311
7.

A critical appraisal of the North American Spine Society guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.

Yaman ME, Gudeloglu A, Senturk S, Yaman ND, Tolunay T, Ozturk Y, Arslan AK.

Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):777-81. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

PMID:
25614152
8.

Occupational Asthma guidelines: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.

Lytras T, Bonovas S, Chronis C, Konstantinidis AK, Kopsachilis F, Papamichail DP, Dounias G.

Occup Environ Med. 2014 Feb;71(2):81-6. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101656. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Review.

PMID:
24213564
9.

Quality of clinical practice guidelines in dermatological oncology.

de Haas ER, de Vijlder HC, van Reesema WS, van Everdingen JJ, Neumann HA.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007 Oct;21(9):1193-8.

PMID:
17894704
10.

Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation.

Radwan M, Akbari Sari A, Rashidian A, Takian A, Abou-Dagga S, Elsous A.

JRSM Open. 2017 Jan 1;8(2):2054270416682673. doi: 10.1177/2054270416682673. eCollection 2017 Jan 1.

11.

The quality of European dermatological guidelines: critical appraisal of the quality of EDF guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.

Werner RN, Marinović B, Rosumeck S, Strohal R, Haering NS, Weberschock T, Dreher AC, Nast A.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Mar;30(3):395-403. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13358. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Review.

PMID:
26466752
12.

Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis.

Dersch R, Toews I, Sommer H, Rauer S, Meerpohl JJ.

BMC Neurol. 2015 Nov 25;15:242. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0501-3. Review.

13.

Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe.

Knai C, Brusamento S, Legido-Quigley H, Saliba V, Panteli D, Turk E, Car J, McKee M, Busse R.

Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 12. Review.

PMID:
22795610
14.

Evaluation of the quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding.

Ríos E, Serón P, Lanas F, Bonfill X, Quigley EM, Alonso-Coello P.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;26(4):422-31. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000033. Review.

PMID:
24535595
15.

Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements in oncology--an assessment of their methodological quality.

Jacobs C, Graham ID, Makarski J, Chassé M, Fergusson D, Hutton B, Clemons M.

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 17;9(10):e110469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110469. eCollection 2014 Oct 17. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116267.

16.

High methodologic quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.

Sabharwal S, Patel NK, Gauher S, Holloway I, Athanasiou T.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1982-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3530-0. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Erratum in: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2309. Thanos, Athansiou [corrected to Athanasiou, Thanos].

17.
18.

Quality of clinical practice guidelines in delirium: a systematic appraisal.

Bush SH, Marchington KL, Agar M, Davis DH, Sikora L, Tsang TW.

BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 10;7(3):e013809. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013809.

19.

The quality of guidelines in pediatric surgery: can we all AGREE?

Shawyer AC, Livingston MH, Manja V, Brouwers MC.

Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Jan;31(1):61-8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3623-6. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
25336247
20.

[Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines of the Chilean explicit guarantees in healthcare program].

Rodríguez MF, Pineda I, Rozas MF.

Rev Med Chil. 2016 Jul;144(7):862-9. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000700006. Spanish.

Supplemental Content

Support Center