Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 86

1.

Direct look from a predator shortens the risk-assessment time by prey.

Lee SI, Hwang S, Joe YE, Cha HK, Joo GH, Lee HJ, Kim JW, Jablonski PG.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 5;8(6):e64977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064977.

2.

Effects of opportunistic predation on anti-predator behavioural responses in a guild of ground foragers.

Fernández-Juricic E, Jokimäki J, McDonald JC, Melado F, Toledano A, Mayo C, Martín B, Fresneda I, Martín V.

Oecologia. 2004 Jun;140(1):183-90.

PMID:
15133731
3.

Split-second escape decisions in blue tits (Parus caeruleus).

Lind J, Kaby U, Jakobsson S.

Naturwissenschaften. 2002 Sep;89(9):420-3.

PMID:
12435096
4.

Dynamics of prey-flock escaping behavior in response to predator's attack.

Lee SH, Pak HK, Chon TS.

J Theor Biol. 2006 May 21;240(2):250-9.

PMID:
16277994
5.

A multi-stage anti-predator response increases information on predation risk.

Hemmi JM, Pfeil A.

J Exp Biol. 2010 May;213(Pt 9):1484-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.039925.

6.
7.

An alternative theoretical approach to escape decision-making: the role of visual cues.

Javůrková V, Šizling AL, Kreisinger J, Albrecht T.

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032522.

8.

Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona.

Corcoran AJ, Wagner RD, Conner WE.

PLoS One. 2013 May 6;8(5):e63609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063609.

9.
10.

Understanding the role of uncertainty on learning and retention of predator information.

Ferrari MC, Vrtělová J, Brown GE, Chivers DP.

Anim Cogn. 2012 Sep;15(5):807-13. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0505-y.

PMID:
22547399
11.
12.

Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.

Stuart YE, Dappen N, Losin N.

PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048497.

13.

Temporal dynamics of information use in learning and retention of predator-related information in tadpoles.

Ferrari MC, Chivers DP.

Anim Cogn. 2013 Jul;16(4):667-76. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0602-6.

PMID:
23389770
14.

Nesting songbirds assess spatial heterogeneity of predatory chipmunks by eavesdropping on their vocalizations.

Emmering QC, Schmidt KA.

J Anim Ecol. 2011 Nov;80(6):1305-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01869.x.

PMID:
21699539
15.

A predator's selection of an individual prey from a group.

Nishimura SI.

Biosystems. 2002 Feb;65(1):25-35.

PMID:
11888661
16.

Habitat-specific sensory-exploitative signals in birds: propensity of dipteran prey to cause evolution of plumage variation in flush-pursuit insectivores.

Jabłoński PG, Lasater K, Mumme RL, Borowiec M, Cygan JP, Pereira J, Sergiej E.

Evolution. 2006 Dec;60(12):2633-42.

PMID:
17263122
17.

Game-theoretic methods for functional response and optimal foraging behavior.

Cressman R, Křivan V, Brown JS, Garay J.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e88773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088773.

18.

Dynamics between a predator and a prey switching two kinds of escape motions.

Furuichi N.

J Theor Biol. 2002 Jul 21;217(2):159-66.

PMID:
12202110
19.

Individual base model of predator-prey system shows predator dominant dynamics.

Takahara Y.

Biosystems. 2000 Aug-Sep;57(3):173-85.

PMID:
11084239
20.

Predator identity and the nature and strength of food web interactions.

Henry LM, Bannerman JA, Gillespie DR, Roitberg BD.

J Anim Ecol. 2010 Nov;79(6):1164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01723.x.

PMID:
20646124
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center