Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

Short-term results of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children.

Senkal OA, Hizal E, Yavuz H, Yilmaz I, Ozluoglu LN.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun;271(6):1415-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2576-z. Epub 2013 Jun 9.

PMID:
23749057
2.

Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.

Bonnard D, Lautissier S, Bosset-Audoit A, Coriat G, Beraha M, Maunoury A, Martel J, Darrouzet V, Bébéar JP, Dauman R.

Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(3):171-83. doi: 10.1159/000346933. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

PMID:
23548561
3.

One-Year Follow Up of Auditory Performance in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP/Saphyr(®) Neo Cochlear Implant System.

Borger D, Lina-Granade G, Verneyre S, Thai-Van H, Saaï S, Hoen M, Gnansia D, Truy E.

Audiol Res. 2015 Oct 12;5(2):139. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2015.139. eCollection 2015 Jun 11.

4.

Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up.

Lazard DS, Bordure P, Lina-Granade G, Magnan J, Meller R, Meyer B, Radafy E, Roux PE, Gnansia D, Péan V, Truy E.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Nov;130(11):1267-73. doi: 10.3109/00016481003769972.

PMID:
20446821
5.

Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant.

Di Lella F, Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Guida M, Bacciu S.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(1):102-7. doi: 10.3109/00016480902896113.

PMID:
19424919
6.

Long-term functional outcomes and academic-occupational status in implanted children after 10 to 14 years of cochlear implant use.

Beadle EA, McKinley DJ, Nikolopoulos TP, Brough J, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold SM.

Otol Neurotol. 2005 Nov;26(6):1152-60.

PMID:
16272934
7.

Multicenter evaluation of Neurelec Digisonic® SP cochlear implant reliability.

Rădulescu L, Cozma S, Niemczyk C, Guevara N, Gahide I, Economides J, Lavieille JP, Meller R, Bébéar JP, Radafy E, Bordure P, Djennaoui D, Truy E.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(4):1507-12. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2266-2. Epub 2012 Nov 18.

PMID:
23161275
8.

Cochlear implantation in children under the age of two: the MHH experience with the CLARION cochlear implant. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, von der Haar-Heise S, Illg A, Bertram B, Battmer RD.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999 Apr;177:44-9.

PMID:
10214801
9.

Minimally invasive pocket technique for the implantation of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant.

Vanlommel M, Lipski S, Dolhen P.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;271(5):913-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2481-5. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

PMID:
23575934
10.

Evaluation of the Digisonic® SP cochlear implant: patient outcomes and fixation system with titanium screws.

Carvalho GM, Guimarães AC, Danieli F, Onuki LC, Paschoal JR, Bianchini WA, Castilho AM.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Dec;78(6):56-62.

11.
12.

Outcomes after cochlear reimplantation in children.

Sterkers F, Merklen F, Piron JP, Vieu A, Venail F, Uziel A, Mondain M.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jun;79(6):840-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

PMID:
25843784
13.

Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.

Bonne NX, Douchement D, Hosana G, Desruelles J, Fayoux P, Ruzza I, Vincent C.

Cochlear Implants Int. 2015 May;16(3):168-74. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000095. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

PMID:
25167217
14.

Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children.

Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Gomolin RH, Shapiro WH, Ozdamar SR, Hoffman RA.

Am J Otol. 1994 Nov;15 Suppl 2:9-13.

PMID:
8572107
15.

Speech performance and sound localization abilities in Neurelec Digisonic® SP binaural cochlear implant users.

Verhaert N, Lazard DS, Gnansia D, Bébéar JP, Romanet P, Meyer B, Péan V, Mollard D, Truy E.

Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(4):256-66. doi: 10.1159/000338472. Epub 2012 May 15.

PMID:
22584289
16.

Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol.

Allum JH, Greisiger R, Straubhaar S, Carpenter MG.

Br J Audiol. 2000 Oct;34(5):293-303.

PMID:
11081754
17.

Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.

Santarelli R, De Filippi R, Genovese E, Arslan E.

Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13(4):257-65. doi: 10.1159/000115435. Epub 2008 Feb 7.

PMID:
18259078
18.

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.

Vincent C, Bébéar JP, Radafy E, Vaneecloo FM, Ruzza I, Lautissier S, Bordure P.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;76(6):858-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.059. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

PMID:
22436413
19.

Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5.

Fang HY, Ko HC, Wang NM, Fang TJ, Chao WC, Tsou YT, Wu CM.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):799-803. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

PMID:
24630030
20.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.

Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, Elston J, Weiner G, Taylor RS, Hoyle M, Liu Z, Price A, Stein K.

Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(44):1-330. doi: 10.3310/hta13440. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center