Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Statistical evaluation of a fully automated mammographic breast density algorithm.

Abdolell M, Tsuruda K, Schaller G, Caines J.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:651091. doi: 10.1155/2013/651091. Epub 2013 May 8.

2.
3.

Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.

Martin KE, Helvie MA, Zhou C, Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Paramagul C, Blane CE, Klein KA, Sonnad SS, Chan HP.

Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):656-65. Epub 2006 Jul 20.

PMID:
16857974
4.

Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.

Gard CC, Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Taplin SH, Rutter CM.

Breast J. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):481-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12443. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

5.

Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.

Ekpo EU, Ujong UP, Mello-Thoms C, McEntee MF.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 May;206(5):1119-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15049. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

PMID:
26999655
6.

Computerized calculation of breast density: our experience from Arcadia Medical Imaging Center.

Jari I, Ursaru M, Gheorghe L, Naum AG, Negru D.

Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2014 Oct-Dec;118(4):979-85.

PMID:
25581957
7.

Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.

Winkel RR, von Euler-Chelpin M, Nielsen M, Diao P, Nielsen MB, Uldall WY, Vejborg I.

BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 12;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1256-3.

8.

Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction.

Llobet R, Pollán M, Antón J, Miranda-García J, Casals M, Martínez I, Ruiz-Perales F, Pérez-Gómez B, Salas-Trejo D, Pérez-Cortés JC.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014 Sep;116(2):105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

PMID:
24636804
9.

Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.

Sartor H, Lång K, Rosso A, Borgquist S, Zackrisson S, Timberg P.

Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4354-4360. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

10.

Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.

Østerås BH, Martinsen AC, Brandal SH, Chaudhry KN, Eben E, Haakenaasen U, Falk RS, Skaane P.

Acta Radiol. 2016 Oct;57(10):1178-85. doi: 10.1177/0284185115626469. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

PMID:
26792823
11.

Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.

Ko SY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ.

Korean J Radiol. 2014 May-Jun;15(3):313-21. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.313. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

12.

How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.

Al Mousa DS, Brennan PC, Ryan EA, Lee WB, Tan J, Mello-Thoms C.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

PMID:
25172414
13.

Impact of the new density reporting laws: radiologist perceptions and actual behavior.

Gur D, Klym AH, King JL, Bandos AI, Sumkin JH.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Jun;22(6):679-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

PMID:
25837723
14.

Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.

Eng A, Gallant Z, Shepherd J, McCormack V, Li J, Dowsett M, Vinnicombe S, Allen S, dos-Santos-Silva I.

Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 20;16(5):439. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0439-1.

15.
16.

Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.

Gweon HM, Youk JH, Kim JA, Son EJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):692-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10197.

PMID:
23971465
17.

Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.

Redondo A, Comas M, Macià F, Ferrer F, Murta-Nascimento C, Maristany MT, Molins E, Sala M, Castells X.

Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):1465-70. doi: 10.1259/bjr/21256379. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

18.

Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one.

Tagliafico A, Tagliafico G, Tosto S, Chiesa F, Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Calabrese M.

Breast. 2009 Feb;18(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Nov 17.

PMID:
19010678
19.

Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?

Al Mousa DS, Mello-Thoms C, Ryan EA, Lee WB, Pietrzyk MW, Reed WM, Heard R, Poulos A, Tan J, Li Y, Brennan PC.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 2.

PMID:
25097013
20.

A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.

Glide-Hurst CK, Duric N, Littrup P.

Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4491-8.

PMID:
18072514

Supplemental Content

Support Center