Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 133

1.

Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for adaptation in the evidence-based guideline "prevention of skin cancer".

Petrarca S, Follmann M, Breitbart EW, Nolte S.

JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Apr;149(4):466-71. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.3306. Review.

PMID:
23715595
2.

Assessment of the scope and quality of clinical practice guidelines in lung cancer.

Harpole LH, Kelley MJ, Schreiber G, Toloza EM, Kolimaga J, McCrory DC.

Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1 Suppl):7S-20S. Review.

PMID:
12527562
3.

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, Niu Y, Du L.

J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141. Review.

PMID:
25594108
4.

[The German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma-part 1: Methodology and results of formal appraisal].

Thole H, Weingart O, Lampert U, Bassler D, Fessler J, Forster J, Franzen D, Geraedts M, Kroegel C, Mörike K, Schmitz M, Scholz R, Teske S, Ollenschläger G; German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma.

Pneumologie. 2003 Aug;57(8):459-67. German.

PMID:
12928987
5.

Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Cheng JS, Lee MJ, Massicotte E, Ashman B, Gruenberg M, Pilcher LE, Skelly AC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4. Review.

PMID:
21952186
6.

Conflict between guideline methodologic quality and recommendation validity: a potential problem for practitioners.

Watine J, Friedberg B, Nagy E, Onody R, Oosterhuis W, Bunting PS, Charet JC, Horvath AR.

Clin Chem. 2006 Jan;52(1):65-72. Review.

7.

An independent AGREE evaluation of the Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines.

Cates JR, Young DN, Bowerman DS, Porter RC.

Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-7.

PMID:
16413451
8.

[Critical appraisal of stroke guidelines].

Otten K, Geraedts M, Kugler C.

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(4):275-81. German.

PMID:
16878796
9.

Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines: article 14 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Burgers JS, Anzueto A, Black PN, Cruz AA, Fervers B, Graham ID, Metersky M, Woodhead M, Yawn BP; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Integrating and Coordinating Efforts in COPD Guideline Development.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):304-10. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-067ST. Review.

PMID:
23256175
10.

Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Schmidt S, Follmann M, Malek N, Manns MP, Greten TF.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;26(12):1779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06891.x.

PMID:
21875430
11.

[Guidelines Clearing House Statement "Hypertension". Summary and recommendations for a rational hypertension guideline in Germany].

Donner-Banzhoff N, Echterhoff HH, Hense HW, Kunz R, Sawicki P, Thürmann P, Jonitz G, Ollenschläger G.

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Jun;94(5):341-9. German.

PMID:
10939145
12.

Practitioner review: evidence-based practice guidelines on alcohol and drug misuse among adolescents: a systematic review.

Bekkering GE, Aertgeerts B, Asueta-Lorente JF, Autrique M, Goossens M, Smets K, van Bussel JC, Vanderplasschen W, Van Royen P, Hannes K.

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;55(1):3-21. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12145. Epub 2013 Oct 7. Review.

PMID:
24117606
13.

Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain.

van Tulder MW, Tuut M, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Assendelft WJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 1;29(17):E357-62. Review.

PMID:
15534397
14.

The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment.

Hu J, Chen R, Wu S, Tang J, Leng G, Kunnamo I, Yang Z, Wang W, Hua X, Zhang Y, Xie Y, Zhan S.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):961-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01893.x. Epub 2012 Jul 29.

PMID:
22845397
15.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

16.

Canadian Thoracic Society: Presenting a new process for clinical practice guideline production.

Gupta S, Bhattacharyya OK, Brouwers MC, Estey EA, Harrison MB, Hernandez P, Palda VA, Boulet LP.

Can Respir J. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):e62-8.

17.

Transparency matters: Kaiser Permanente's National Guideline Program methodological processes.

Davino-Ramaya C, Krause LK, Robbins CW, Harris JS, Koster M, Chan W, Tom GI.

Perm J. 2012 Winter;16(1):55-62. Review.

18.

Systematic review of current guidelines, and their evidence base, on risk of lactic acidosis after administration of contrast medium for patients receiving metformin.

Goergen SK, Rumbold G, Compton G, Harris C.

Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):261-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090690. Review.

PMID:
20032157
19.

Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on pancreatic cancer: a PRISMA-compliant article.

He Z, Tian H, Song A, Jin L, Zhou X, Liu X, Guo W, Zhang Z.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(12):e635. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000635.

20.

Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal of International Guidelines on Perinatal Care of Extremely Premature Infants.

Binepal N, Lemyre B, Dunn S, Daboval T, Aglipay M, Leduc S, Moore GP.

Curr Pediatr Rev. 2015;11(2):126-34. Review.

PMID:
26050792

Supplemental Content

Support Center