Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 83

1.

Radiologists' performance in the ACR Breast MR With Guided Biopsy course.

Lee CI, Grauke LJ, Sandhir V, Demartini WB, Newstead GM, Peacock S, Lehman CD.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Nov;10(11):854-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 May 25.

PMID:
23714721
2.

Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management.

Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL, Poole PS, Sippo DA, Giess CS.

Radiology. 2016 Sep;280(3):707-15. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151548. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

PMID:
27089027
3.

Frequency of malignancy seen in probably benign lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: findings from ACRIN 6667.

Weinstein SP, Hanna LG, Gatsonis C, Schnall MD, Rosen MA, Lehman CD.

Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):731-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10081712.

4.

High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADSĀ® descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer?

Pinker-Domenig K, Bogner W, Gruber S, Bickel H, Duffy S, Schernthaner M, Dubsky P, Pluschnig U, Rudas M, Trattnig S, Helbich TH.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):322-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2256-6. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

PMID:
21913060
5.

Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.

Grimm LJ, Anderson AL, Baker JA, Johnson KS, Walsh R, Yoon SC, Ghate SV.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):1120-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13047.

PMID:
25905951
6.

Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging.

Mahoney MC, Gatsonis C, Hanna L, DeMartini WB, Lehman C.

Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):51-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110619. Epub 2012 May 15.

7.

Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up.

Hambly NM, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Brennan S, Morris EA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):218-24. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4550.

PMID:
21178070
8.

False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.

Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1658-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3486.

PMID:
20489110
9.

Screening breast MR imaging: comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies.

Abramovici G, Mainiero MB.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):85-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101009. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

PMID:
21285337
10.

BI-RADS 3 for magnetic resonance imaging.

Comstock C, Sung JS.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013 Aug;21(3):561-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.04.006. Review.

PMID:
23928245
11.

Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended.

Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1025-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2480.

PMID:
19770325
12.

A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists.

Timmers JM, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Verbeek AL, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJ.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

PMID:
21899969
13.

Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations.

Shimauchi A, Ota H, Machida Y, Yoshida T, Satani N, Mori N, Takase K, Tozaki M.

Eur J Radiol. 2016 Feb;85(2):480-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.043. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

PMID:
26781155
14.

Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.

Pediconi F, Padula S, Dominelli V, Luciani M, Telesca M, Casali V, Kirchin MA, Passariello R, Catalano C.

Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):653-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100732. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

PMID:
20884914
15.

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 for magnetic resonance imaging.

Lee KA.

Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Dec;23(6):337-44. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000037. Review.

PMID:
25463408
16.

Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses.

Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, La Trenta LR, Hadar O, Abramson A, Dershaw DD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Sep;177(3):551-7.

PMID:
11517046
17.

DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement?

Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, Abe H, Schmidt RA, Giger M, Newstead GM.

Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7):3102-9.

18.

BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.

Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):994-1000. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1983.

PMID:
19770321
19.

Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?

Arazi-Kleinman T, Causer PA, Jong RA, Hill K, Warner E.

Clin Radiol. 2009 Dec;64(12):1166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

PMID:
19913125
20.

Emergency radiology elective improves second-year medical students' perceived confidence and knowledge of appropriate imaging utilization.

Leschied JR, Knoepp US, Hoff CN, Mazza MB, Klein KA, Mullan PB, Kelly AM.

Acad Radiol. 2013 Sep;20(9):1168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.05.011.

PMID:
23931432

Supplemental Content

Support Center