Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 91

1.

Estimation of wall properties and wall strength of aortic aneurysms using modern imaging techniques. One more step towards a patient-specific assessment of aneurysm rupture risk.

Kontopodis N, Georgakarakos E, Metaxa E, Pagonidis K, Papaharilaou Y, Ioannou CV.

Med Hypotheses. 2013 Aug;81(2):212-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.04.048. Epub 2013 May 25.

PMID:
23714223
2.

A novel strategy to translate the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms to their equivalent diameter risk: method and retrospective validation.

Gasser TC, Nchimi A, Swedenborg J, Roy J, Sakalihasan N, Böckler D, Hyhlik-Dürr A.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;47(3):288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.018. Epub 2014 Jan 20.

3.

A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.

Vande Geest JP, Di Martino ES, Bohra A, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Nov;1085:11-21.

PMID:
17182918
4.

Advancements in identifying biomechanical determinants for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.

Kontopodis N, Metaxa E, Papaharilaou Y, Tavlas E, Tsetis D, Ioannou C.

Vascular. 2015 Feb;23(1):65-77. doi: 10.1177/1708538114532084. Epub 2014 Apr 22. Review.

PMID:
24757027
5.

Changes in geometric configuration and biomechanical parameters of a rapidly growing abdominal aortic aneurysm may provide insight in aneurysms natural history and rupture risk.

Kontopodis N, Metaxa E, Papaharilaou Y, Georgakarakos E, Tsetis D, Ioannou CV.

Theor Biol Med Model. 2013 Dec 5;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-10-67.

6.

Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.

Di Martino ES, Bohra A, Vande Geest JP, Gupta N, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA.

J Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar;43(3):570-6; discussion 576.

7.

Perfusion computed tomography imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms may be of value for patient specific rupture risk estimation.

Kontopodis N, Galanakis N, Tsetis D, Ioannou CV.

Med Hypotheses. 2017 Apr;101:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

PMID:
28351494
8.

Peak wall stress does not necessarily predict the location of rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV, Papaharilaou Y, Kostas T, Tsetis D, Katsamouris AN.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;39(3):302-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.021. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

9.

[Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics].

Giannoglou G, Giannakoulas G, Hatzitolios AI, Rudolf J.

Herz. 2008 Jul;33(5):354-61. doi: 10.1007/s00059-008-3067-7. Epub 2008 Sep 5. Review. German.

PMID:
18773155
10.

A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.

Maier A, Gee MW, Reeps C, Pongratz J, Eckstein HH, Wall WA.

Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Oct;38(10):3124-34. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0067-6. Epub 2010 May 18.

PMID:
20480238
11.

Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Speelman L, Bohra A, Bosboom EM, Schurink GW, van de Vosse FN, Makaorun MS, Vorp DA.

J Biomech Eng. 2007 Feb;129(1):105-9.

PMID:
17227104
12.

A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Doyle BJ, Callanan A, McGloughlin TM.

Biomed Eng Online. 2007 Oct 19;6:38.

13.

Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.

Scotti CM, Shkolnik AD, Muluk SC, Finol EA.

Biomed Eng Online. 2005 Nov 4;4:64.

14.

The - Not So - Solid 5.5 cm Threshold for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Facts, Misinterpretations, and Future Directions.

Kontopodis N, Pantidis D, Dedes A, Daskalakis N, Ioannou CV.

Front Surg. 2016 Jan 25;3:1. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00001. eCollection 2016. Review.

15.

Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry.

Vorp DA, Raghavan ML, Webster MW.

J Vasc Surg. 1998 Apr;27(4):632-9. Erratum in: J Vasc Surg 1998 Aug;28(2):272.

16.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.

Rissland P, Alemu Y, Einav S, Ricotta J, Bluestein D.

J Biomech Eng. 2009 Mar;131(3):031001. doi: 10.1115/1.3005200.

PMID:
19154060
17.

Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.

Vorp DA, Vande Geest JP.

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005 Aug;25(8):1558-66. Review.

18.

Patient-specific biomechanical profiling in abdominal aortic aneurysm development and rupture.

Malkawi AH, Hinchliffe RJ, Xu Y, Holt PJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM.

J Vasc Surg. 2010 Aug;52(2):480-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.029. Epub 2010 Apr 14. Review.

19.

Biomechanical Indices for Rupture Risk Estimation in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Leemans EL, Willems TP, van der Laan MJ, Slump CH, Zeebregts CJ.

J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):254-261. doi: 10.1177/1526602816680088. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

PMID:
27872318
20.

Geometrical factors as predictors of increased growth rate or increased rupture risk in small aortic aneurysms.

Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV.

Med Hypotheses. 2012 Jul;79(1):71-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

PMID:
22541859

Supplemental Content

Support Center