Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, van der Veen EH, Kalkman RK, Frijns JH.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct;14(5):781-90. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0395-y. Epub 2013 May 22.

2.

Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.

Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, Vanpoucke FJ, Frijns JH.

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):367-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234efd5.

PMID:
22048258
3.

Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Wu CC, Luo X.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Apr;14(2):213-31. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0366-8. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

4.

Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.

Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.

Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):38S-41S.

PMID:
17496643
5.

Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.

Saoji AA, Litvak LM, Hughes ML.

Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):559-67. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b6f.

PMID:
19617837
6.

Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance.

Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, Vanpoucke FJ, Frijns JH.

Ear Hear. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):221-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181f8c0fe.

PMID:
21063206
7.

Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.

Bierer JA, Nye AD.

Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):641-51. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000058.

8.

Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities.

Frijns JH, Kalkman RK, Vanpoucke FJ, Bongers JS, Briaire JJ.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 Apr;129(4):433-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480802610218.

PMID:
19117170
9.

Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).

Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):623-6.

PMID:
16158620
10.

Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients.

Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L.

Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):629-36.

PMID:
17667771
11.

Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.

Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.

Neuroscience. 2008 Jun 12;154(1):370-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.041. Epub 2008 Feb 29.

PMID:
18384971
12.

Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.

Shannon RV, Otto SR.

Hear Res. 1990 Aug 1;47(1-2):159-68.

PMID:
2228792
13.
14.

Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.

Bierer JA, Faulkner KF.

Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):247-58. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c7daf4. Erratum in: Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):633.

15.

Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.

Berenstein CK, Vanpoucke FJ, Mulder JJ, Mens LH.

Hear Res. 2010 Dec 1;270(1-2):28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

PMID:
20946945
16.
17.

[Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis].

Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Laszig R.

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1988 Aug;67(8):412-5. German.

PMID:
3210875
18.

Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Kirby B, Brown C, Abbas P, Etler C, O'Brien S.

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):389-98. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318239adb8.

19.

A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.

Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun;126(6):581-6.

PMID:
16720441
20.

The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.

Arnoldner C, Riss D, Kaider A, Mair A, Wagenblast J, Baumgartner WD, Gstöttner W, Hamzavi JS.

Laryngoscope. 2008 Sep;118(9):1630-6. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181799715.

PMID:
18545213

Supplemental Content

Support Center