Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 143

1.

Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS.

Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Thornton S.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Aug;27(2):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.04.013.

PMID:
23683847
2.

A cautionary note against embryo aneuploidy risk assessment using time-lapse imaging.

Ottolini C, Rienzi L, Capalbo A.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):273-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.015.

PMID:
24433755
3.

Aneuploidy is a key causal factor of delays in blastulation: author response to 'A cautionary note against aneuploidy risk assessment using time-lapse imaging'.

Campbell A, Fishel S, Laegdsmand M.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):279-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.016.

PMID:
24444816
4.

Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Mar;30(3):281-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.11.015. Review.

PMID:
25599824
5.
6.

Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles.

Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman LR, Austin C, Goldberg J, Falcone T.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Jun 20;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-54.

7.

The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of  implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.

Basile N, Vime P, Florensa M, Aparicio Ruiz B, García Velasco JA, Remohí J, Meseguer M.

Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):276-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu331.

8.

No beneficial effect of preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age with a high risk for embryonic aneuploidy.

Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, Hoek A, Heineman MJ, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, Korevaar JC.

Hum Reprod. 2008 Dec;23(12):2813-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den231.

9.

Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.

Kaser DJ, Racowsky C.

Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu023. Review.

10.

Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005291. Review.

PMID:
16437524
11.

Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2425-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det251.

12.

Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?

Kramer YG, Kofinas JD, Melzer K, Noyes N, McCaffrey C, Buldo-Licciardi J, McCulloh DH, Grifo JA.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Sep;31(9):1231-42. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0285-1.

13.

Predictive value of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated IVF-ET cycles among women with recurrent implantation failure.

Pagidas K, Ying Y, Keefe D.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008 Feb-Mar;25(2-3):103-6. doi: 10.1007/s10815-008-9200-y.

14.

Multinucleation of a sibling blastomere on day 2 suggests unsuitability for embryo transfer in IVF-preimplantation genetic screening cycles.

Ambroggio J, Gindoff PR, Dayal MB, Khaldi R, Peak D, Frankfurter D, Dubey AK.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Oct;96(4):856-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1110.

PMID:
21851938
15.

Semi-automated morphometric analysis of human embryos can reveal correlations between total embryo volume and clinical pregnancy.

Paternot G, Debrock S, De Neubourg D, D'Hooghe TM, Spiessens C.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):627-33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des427.

16.

Lessons from elective in vitro fertilization (IVF) in, principally, non-infertile women.

Gleicher N, Kim A, Weghofer A, Barad DH.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012 Jun 20;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-48.

17.

An analysis of the impact of embryo transfer difficulty on live birth rates, using a standardised grading system.

Listijono DR, Boylan T, Cooke S, Kilani S, Chapman MG.

Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013 Sep;16(3):211-4. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2013.804956.

PMID:
23862557
18.

Assessment of aneuploidy formation in human blastocysts resulting from donated eggs and the necessity of the embryos for aneuploidy screening.

Haddad G, Deng M, Wang CT, Witz C, Williams D, Griffith J, Skorupski J, Gill J, Wang WH.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Jun;32(6):999-1006. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0492-4.

19.

Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes.

Basile N, Morbeck D, García-Velasco J, Bronet F, Meseguer M.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):634-41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des462.

20.

Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer.

Csokmay JM, Hill MJ, Cioppettini FV, Miller KA, Scott RT Jr, Frattarelli JL.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Sep;92(3):913-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1741.

PMID:
18774561
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center