Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High.

Holden LK, Brenner C, Reeder RM, Firszt JB.

Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Nov;14(5):276-86. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000034.

2.

Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.

Koch DB, Quick A, Osberger MJ, Saoji A, Litvak L.

Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jun;35(5):803-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000301.

PMID:
24691504
3.

Evaluation of the ClearVoice Strategy in Adults Using HiResolution Fidelity 120 Sound Processing.

Kam AC, Ng IH, Cheng MM, Wong TK, Tong MC.

Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;5 Suppl 1:S89-92. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S89.

4.

Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Han D, Liu B, Zhou N, Chen X, Kong Y, Liu H, Zheng Y, Xu L.

Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):169-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819342cf.

6.
7.

Pediatric Evaluation of the ClearVoice™ Speech Enhancement Algorithm in Everyday Life.

Noël-Petroff N, Mathias N, Ulmann C, Abbeele TV.

Audiol Res. 2013 Dec 11;3(1):e9. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2013.e9.

8.

Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.

Skinner MW, Arndt PL, Staller SJ.

Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):2S-17S.

PMID:
11883765
9.

An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.

James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.

Ear Hear. 2003 Apr;24(2):157-74.

PMID:
12677112
10.

Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.

Chang YT, Yang HM, Lin YH, Liu SH, Wu JL.

Otol Neurotol. 2009 Sep;30(6):750-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b286b2.

PMID:
19704359
11.

The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.

Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.

Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):590-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181acfb70.

PMID:
19561509
12.
13.

Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W.

Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68.

PMID:
15547426
14.

Influence of signal processing strategy in auditory abilities.

Melo TM, Bevilacqua MC, Costa OA, Moret AL.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Sep-Oct;79(5):629-35. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130113. English, Portuguese.

15.

Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.

Oba SI, Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd.

Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):573-81. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820fc821.

16.

Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.

Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Cowdrey L, King S.

Ear Hear. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):521-33. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9dfc.

17.
18.

Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.

Baudhuin J, Cadieux J, Firszt JB, Reeder RM, Maxson JL.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 May;23(5):302-12. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.5.2.

19.

Benefits of the HiRes 120 coding strategy combined with the Harmony processor in an adult European multicentre study.

Büchner A, Lenarz T, Boermans PP, Frijns JH, Mancini P, Filipo R, Fielden C, Cooper H, Eklöf M, Freijd A, Lombaard S, Meerton L, Pickerill M, Vanat Z, Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Kienast B, Boyle P, Arnold L, Meyer B, Sterkers O, Müller-Deile J, Ambrosch P, Helbig S, Frachet B, Gallego S, Truy E, Jeffs E, Morant A, Marco J.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;132(2):179-87. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.630015.

PMID:
22074015
20.

Electromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation (FM) receivers to cochlear implant sound processors.

Schafer EC, Romine D, Musgrave E, Momin S, Huynh C.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Nov-Dec;24(10):927-40. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.10.5.

PMID:
24384079

Supplemental Content

Support Center