Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 169

1.

Comparison of polyvinyl alcohol coated nasal packing with non-absorbable nasal packing.

Seol JH, Kim JM, Kim SS, Na BR, Jung H, Cho JH, Kim JK.

Rhinology. 2013 Jun;51(2):137-42. doi: 10.4193/Rhino12.176.

PMID:
23671894
2.

Role of nasal packing in surgical outcome for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis.

Verim A, Seneldir L, Naiboğlu B, Karaca ÇT, Külekçi S, Toros SZ, Oysu Ç.

Laryngoscope. 2014 Jul;124(7):1529-35. doi: 10.1002/lary.24543. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

PMID:
24284971
3.

Comparison of three different polyvinyl alcohol packs following functional endoscopic Nasal surgery.

Melis A, Karligkiotis A, Bozzo C, Machouchas N, Volpi L, Castiglia P, Castelnuovo P, Meloni F.

Laryngoscope. 2015 May;125(5):1067-71. doi: 10.1002/lary.25105. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

PMID:
25545810
4.
5.

Effect of polyvinyl acetal sponge nasal packing on post-operative care of nasal polyposis patients: a randomised, controlled, partly blinded study.

Saedi B, Sadeghi M, Farschi S.

J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Apr;126(4):380-4. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111003471. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

PMID:
22310061
6.

Advantages of glove finger-coated polyvinyl acetate pack in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Kim DW, Lee EJ, Kim SW, Jeon SY.

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012 Sep-Oct;26(5):e147-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3813.

PMID:
23168147
7.

[Comparative study on packing with or without Merocel after endoscopic sinus surgery].

Chen X, Shi Z, Li X, Shan B, Xue T, Qiao L, Chen F.

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;50(10):854-7. Chinese.

PMID:
26696482
8.

Preventive effects of polyurethane foam and polyvinyl acetate on bleeding and pain in young patients undergoing conchotomies.

Kim ST, Cho KB, Kang IG.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;77(1):113-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 3.

PMID:
23131199
9.

The efficacy of Cutanplast nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Cho KS, Shin SK, Lee JH, Kim JY, Koo SK, Kim YW, Kim MJ, Roh HJ.

Laryngoscope. 2013 Mar;123(3):564-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23643. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

PMID:
23086679
10.

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of gloved versus ungloved merocel middle meatal spacers for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Akbari E, Philpott CM, Ostry AJ, Clark A, Javer AR.

Rhinology. 2012 Sep;50(3):306-10. doi: 10.4193/Rhino11.215.

PMID:
22888489
11.

Double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of medicated versus nonmedicated merocel sponges for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Chang EH, Alandejani T, Akbari E, Ostry A, Javer A.

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Feb;40 Suppl 1:S14-9.

PMID:
21453656
12.

Systemic effects and safety of triamcinolone-impregnated nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Hong SD, Kim JH, Dhong HJ, Kim HY, Chung SK, Chang YS, Sohn JH.

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):407-10. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3924.

PMID:
24119605
13.

Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.

Berlucchi M, Castelnuovo P, Vincenzi A, Morra B, Pasquini E.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jun;266(6):839-45. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0841-3. Epub 2008 Oct 23.

PMID:
18946677
14.

Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction using biodegradable (NasoPore) and non-biodegradable packing, a double-blind, prospective, randomized study.

Burduk PK, Wierzchowska M, Grześkowiak B, Kaźmierczak W, Wawrzyniak K.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan - Feb;83(1):23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

15.

Effectiveness of Synthetic Polyurethane Foam as a Nasal Packing Material in Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy.

Lee J, Lee H, Lee HK, Chang M, Park M, Baek S.

J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2207-11. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001985.

PMID:
26468811
16.

Rapid Rhino versus Merocel nasal packs in septal surgery.

Hesham A, Ghali A.

J Laryngol Otol. 2011 Dec;125(12):1244-6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111002179. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

PMID:
21854674
17.

Anti-adhesive effect of a thermosensitive poloxamer applied after the removal of nasal packing in endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomised multicentre clinical trial.

Song KJ, Lee HM, Lee EJ, Kwon JH, Jo KH, Kim KS.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2013 Jun;38(3):225-30. doi: 10.1111/coa.12117.

PMID:
23745533
18.

[The application of no nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in type I and type II chronic sinusitis].

Xu W, Xu G, Li B, Li Y.

Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Dec;26(24):1123-6. Chinese.

PMID:
23477118
19.

Evaluation of calcium alginate nasal packing (Algostéril) versus Polyvinyl acetal (Merocel) for nasal packing after inferior turbinate resection.

Chevillard C, Rugina M, Bonfils P, Bougara A, Castillo L, Crampette L, Pandraud L, Samardzic M, Peynègre R.

Rhinology. 2006 Mar;44(1):58-61.

PMID:
16550952
20.

A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and Telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery.

Cruise AS, Amonoo-Kuofi K, Srouji I, Kanagalingam J, Georgalas C, Patel NN, Badia L, Lund VJ.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Feb;31(1):25-32.

PMID:
16441798

Supplemental Content

Support Center