Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

Diagnosis and prevalence of lanolin allergy.

Miest RY, Yiannias JA, Chang YH, Singh N.

Dermatitis. 2013 May-Jun;24(3):119-23. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e3182937aa4.

PMID:
23665833
2.

Positive patch test reactions to lanolin: cross-sectional data from the north american contact dermatitis group, 1994 to 2006.

Warshaw EM, Nelsen DD, Maibach HI, Marks JG, Zug KA, Taylor JS, Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, Mathias CG, Pratt MD, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA.

Dermatitis. 2009 Mar-Apr;20(2):79-88.

PMID:
19426613
3.

Discrepancy in patch test results with wool wax alcohols and Amerchol L-101.

Matthieu L, Dockx P.

Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Mar;36(3):150-1.

PMID:
9145265
4.

A retrospective analysis of contact allergy to lanolin.

Wakelin SH, Smith H, White IR, Rycroft RJ, McFadden JP.

Br J Dermatol. 2001 Jul;145(1):28-31.

PMID:
11453903
5.

Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.

Wetter DA, Yiannias JA, Prakash AV, Davis MD, Farmer SA, el-Azhary RA.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Nov;63(5):789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033.

PMID:
20643495
6.

Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema.

Moustafa M, Holden CR, Athavale P, Cork MJ, Messenger AG, Gawkrodger DJ.

Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Oct;65(4):208-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01900.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

PMID:
21504435
8.

Which children should we patch test?

Beattie PE, Green C, Lowe G, Lewis-Jones MS.

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007 Jan;32(1):6-11. Epub 2006 Sep 27.

PMID:
17004990
9.

Allergy to lanolin.

Mortensen T.

Contact Dermatitis. 1979 May;5(3):137-9.

PMID:
455960
10.

The frequency of lanolin contact allergy.

Henderson CA, Highet AS, Shamy HK.

Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Jan;32(1):52. No abstract available.

PMID:
7720379
11.

Lanolin allergy: history, epidemiology, responsible allergens, and management.

Lee B, Warshaw E.

Dermatitis. 2008 Mar-Apr;19(2):63-72. Review.

PMID:
18413106
12.

Contact sensitization to the allergens of European baseline series in patients with chronic leg ulcers.

Beliauskienė A, Valiukevičienė S, Sitkauskienė B, Schnuch A, Uter W.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2011;47(9):480-5. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

13.
14.
16.

A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.

Camacho-Halili M, Axelrod S, Michelis MA, Lighvani S, Khan F, Leon S, Aquino MR, Davis-Lorton M, Fonacier LS.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

PMID:
22123377
17.

What is the relevance of contact allergy to sodium metabisulfite and which concentration of the allergen should we use?

Ralph N, Verma S, Merry S, Lally A, Kirby B, Collins P.

Dermatitis. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):162-5. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000120.

PMID:
26172484
18.

The myth of lanolin allergy.

Kligman AM.

Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Sep;39(3):103-7. Review.

PMID:
9771981
19.

Detection of contact allergy: using more extensive test series increases the diagnostic efficacy of patch tests.

Czarnobilska E, Lach K, Odrzywołek L, Sliwa Ł, Wsołek-Wnik K, Obtułowicz K, Spiewak R.

Przegl Lek. 2010;67(2):103-6.

PMID:
20557008
20.

Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.

Dickel H, Kreft B, Kuss O, Worm M, Soost S, Brasch J, Pfützner W, Grabbe J, Angelova-Fischer I, Elsner P, Fluhr J, Altmeyer P, Geier J.

Contact Dermatitis. 2010 May;62(5):294-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01710.x.

PMID:
20536477

Supplemental Content

Support Center