Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 127

1.

Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy.

Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M.

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2253-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2973-9. Epub 2013 May 10.

PMID:
23660720
2.

Evaluating the impact of a minimally invasive pediatric surgeon on hospital practice: comparison of two children's hospitals.

Jackson HT, Shah SR, Hathaway E, Nadler EP, Amdur RL, McGue S, Kane TD.

Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2281-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4227-5. Epub 2015 Oct 19.

PMID:
26482157
3.

Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.

Yeo HL, Isaacs AJ, Abelson JS, Milsom JW, Sedrakyan A.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Jun;59(6):535-42. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000580.

PMID:
27145311
4.

Are open abdominal procedures a thing of the past? An analysis of graduating general surgery residents' case logs from 2000 to 2011.

McCoy AC, Gasevic E, Szlabick RE, Sahmoun AE, Sticca RP.

J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.002.

PMID:
24209640
5.

Evolution of minimally invasive techniques within an academic surgical practice at a single institution.

Acker SN, Staulcup S, Partrick DA, Sømme S.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Nov;24(11):806-10. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0239. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

PMID:
25290379
6.

Minimally invasive surgery in gastrointestinal cancer: benefits, challenges, and solutions for underutilization.

Hamed OH, Gusani NJ, Kimchi ET, Kavic SM.

JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). pii: e2014.00134. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00134. Review.

7.

A national review of the frequency of minimally invasive surgery among general surgery residents: assessment of ACGME case logs during 2 decades of general surgery resident training.

Richards MK, McAteer JP, Drake FT, Goldin AB, Khandelwal S, Gow KW.

JAMA Surg. 2015 Feb;150(2):169-72. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1791.

PMID:
25548997
8.

Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.

Gandaglia G, Ghani KR, Sood A, Meyers JR, Sammon JD, Schmid M, Varda B, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Sun M, Menon M, Kibel AS, Trinh QD.

JAMA Surg. 2014 Oct;149(10):1039-44. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.292.

PMID:
25143176
9.

Minimally invasive surgery adoption into an established surgical practice: impact of a fellowship-trained colleague.

Dominguez EP, Barrat C, Shaffer L, Gruner R, Whisler D, Taylor P.

Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1267-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2594-8. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

PMID:
23232996
10.

Minimally invasive right colectomy: challenges and clinical practice.

Vinci A, Hanna MH, Pigazzi A.

Minerva Chir. 2015 Oct;70(5):297-309. Epub 2015 Sep 10. Review.

PMID:
26365367
11.

Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.

Altieri MS, Yang J, Telem DA, Zhu J, Halbert C, Talamini M, Pryor AD.

Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4327-2. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

PMID:
26139489
12.

Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review.

Cooper MA, Hutfless S, Segev DL, Ibrahim A, Lyu H, Makary MA.

BMJ. 2014 Jul 8;349:g4198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4198.

13.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

14.

Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review.

Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg JU, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Tewari A, Cadeddu JA.

Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):266-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Review.

PMID:
22940173
15.

Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations.

Kuo LE, Murayama K, Simmons KD, Kelz RR.

Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):514-520. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001697.

PMID:
28169926
16.

The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.

Disbrow DE, Pannell SM, Shanker BA, Albright J, Wu J, Bastawrous A, Soliman M, Ferraro J, Cleary RK.

J Surg Educ. 2017 Oct 17. pii: S1931-7204(17)30379-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.006. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29054345
17.

Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Roumm AR, Pizzi L, Goldfarb NI, Cohn H.

Surg Innov. 2005 Sep;12(3):261-87. Review. Erratum in: Surg Innov. 2006 Mar;13(1):16.

PMID:
16224649
18.

Minimally invasive surgery: the pediatric surgery experience.

Firilas AM, Jackson RJ, Smith SD.

J Am Coll Surg. 1998 May;186(5):542-4.

PMID:
9583694
19.

The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes.

Scalici J, Laughlin BB, Finan MA, Wang B, Rocconi RP.

Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Mar;136(3):512-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

PMID:
25462206
20.

Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.

Mehta A, Xu T, Hutfless S, Makary MA, Sinno AK, Tanner EJ 3rd, Stone RL, Wang K, Fader AN.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):497.e1-497.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

Supplemental Content

Support Center