Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 203

1.

Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population.

Gao H, Su G, Janss L, Zhang Y, Lund MS.

J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jul;96(7):4678-87. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6406. Epub 2013 May 6.

2.
3.

Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.

Haile-Mariam M, Pryce JE, Schrooten C, Hayes BJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2015 May;98(5):3443-59. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8785. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

PMID:
25771052
4.

Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.

Su G, Christensen OF, Janss L, Lund MS.

J Dairy Sci. 2014 Oct;97(10):6547-59. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8210. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

5.

Accuracy of genomic prediction using different models and response variables in the Nordic Red cattle population.

Gao H, Lund MS, Zhang Y, Su G.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2013 Oct;130(5):333-40. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12039. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

PMID:
24074170
6.

Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.

Su G, Madsen P, Nielsen US, Mäntysaari EA, Aamand GP, Christensen OF, Lund MS.

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Feb;95(2):909-17. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4804.

7.

Reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values in Danish Jersey.

Thomasen JR, Guldbrandtsen B, Su G, Brøndum RF, Lund MS.

Animal. 2012 May;6(5):789-96. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111002035.

PMID:
22558926
8.

Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.

Jiménez-Montero JA, González-Recio O, Alenda R.

J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jan;96(1):625-34. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5631. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

PMID:
23102955
9.

Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds.

Zhou L, Heringstad B, Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Meuwissen TH, Svendsen M, Grove H, Nielsen US, Lund MS.

J Dairy Sci. 2014 Jul;97(7):4485-96. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7580. Epub 2014 May 2.

10.

Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.

Gao H, Madsen P, Nielsen US, Aamand GP, Su G, Byskov K, Jensen J.

J Dairy Sci. 2015 Dec;98(12):9051-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9947. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

11.

Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle.

Neves HH, Carvalheiro R, O'Brien AM, Utsunomiya YT, do Carmo AS, Schenkel FS, Sölkner J, McEwan JC, Van Tassell CP, Cole JB, da Silva MV, Queiroz SA, Sonstegard TS, Garcia JF.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Feb 27;46:17. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-17.

12.

Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population.

Rius-Vilarrasa E, Brøndum RF, Strandén I, Guldbrandtsen B, Strandberg E, Lund MS, Fikse WF.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2012 Oct;129(5):369-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2012.00989.x. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

PMID:
22963358
13.

Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.

Dassonneville R, Brøndum RF, Druet T, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Ducrocq V, Su G.

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jul;94(7):3679-86. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4299.

PMID:
21700057
14.

Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle.

Makgahlela ML, Mäntysaari EA, Strandén I, Koivula M, Nielsen US, Sillanpää MJ, Juga J.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2013 Feb;130(1):10-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2012.01017.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

PMID:
23317061
15.

Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.

Chen L, Li C, Sargolzaei M, Schenkel F.

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e101544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101544. eCollection 2014.

16.

Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.

Jiménez-Montero JA, Gianola D, Weigel K, Alenda R, González-Recio O.

J Dairy Sci. 2013 Sep;96(9):6047-58. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6793. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

PMID:
23810591
17.

Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.

Saatchi M, Ward J, Garrick DJ.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Apr;91(4):1538-51. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5593. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

18.

Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.

Mulder HA, Calus MP, Druet T, Schrooten C.

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Feb;95(2):876-89. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4490.

PMID:
22281352
19.

Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations.

Brøndum RF, Rius-Vilarrasa E, Strandén I, Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Fikse WF, Lund MS.

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Sep;94(9):4700-7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3765. Erratum in: J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jul;96(7):4771.

20.

Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.

Karoui S, Carabaño MJ, Díaz C, Legarra A.

Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Dec 7;44:39. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-39.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk