Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 183

1.

Comparison of functional performance after total knee arthroplasty using rotating platform and fixed-bearing prostheses with or without patellar resurfacing.

Chen LB, Tan Y, Al-Aidaros M, Wang H, Wang X, Cai SH.

Orthop Surg. 2013 May;5(2):112-7. doi: 10.1111/os.12040.

PMID:
23658046
2.

LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.

Vogt JC, Saarbach C.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

3.

A prospective randomised study comparing rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty in a cruciate substituting design--outcomes at two year follow-up.

Ferguson KB, Bailey O, Anthony I, James PJ, Stother IG, M J G B.

Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

PMID:
24145068
4.

Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.

Choi WC, Lee S, Seong SC, Jung JH, Lee MC.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2634-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01122. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

PMID:
20952606
5.

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Hofstede SN, Nouta KA, Jacobs W, van Hooff ML, Wymenga AB, Pijls BG, Nelissen RG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;(2):CD003130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003130.pub3. Review.

PMID:
25650566
6.

[EFFECTIVENESS OF UC ULTRA-CONGRUENT ROTATING PLATFORM PROSTHESIS IN TREATMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS].

Huo S, Wang H, Zhou C, Chen Q, Dong L, Tang H, Guo C, Chen J, Liu Y.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Nov;29(11):1342-7. Chinese.

PMID:
26875264
7.

Patellar clunk syndrome in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised versus cruciate-substituting prostheses.

Tang YH, Wong WK, Wong HL.

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Apr;22(1):80-3.

8.

Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis.

Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, Kim HJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 May 16;94(10):866-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00884.

PMID:
22617913
9.
10.

Randomized clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically detectable differences at five years.

Kalisvaart MM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):481-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00315.

PMID:
22437996
11.
12.

The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ashour A, Saintmard B, Aubaniac JM.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 4;94(7):638-44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00263.

PMID:
22488620
13.

Clinical and biomechanical assessment of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Berti L, Benedetti MG, Ensini A, Catani F, Giannini S.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jul;21(6):610-6. Epub 2006 Mar 3.

PMID:
16516359
14.

Comparative flexion after rotating-platform vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Evans MC, Parsons EM, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Zurakowski D.

J Arthroplasty. 2006 Oct;21(7):985-91.

PMID:
17027540
15.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Fu Y, Wang G, Fu Q.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1460-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1365-0. Epub 2011 Jan 14. Review.

PMID:
21234539
16.

[The evaluation of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing].

Ozt├╝rk A, Bilgen S, Atici T, Ozer O, Bilgen OF.

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2006;40(1):29-37. Turkish.

17.

Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs: surgical technique.

Luna JT, Sembrano JN, Gioe TJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep;92 Suppl 1 Pt 2:240-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00157.

PMID:
20844179
18.

Comparison of patellar retention versus resurfacing in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Hwang BH, Yang IH, Han CD.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Mar;20(3):524-31. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1593-y. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

PMID:
21720892
19.

International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.

Comfort T, Baste V, Froufe MA, Namba R, Bordini B, Robertsson O, Cafri G, Paxton E, Sedrakyan A, Graves S.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 17;96 Suppl 1:65-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00462.

20.

Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses.

Choi WC, Ryu KJ, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 May;471(5):1512-22. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2652-5.

Supplemental Content

Support Center