Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 167

1.

Comparison between the Truview PCD™ or the GlideScope® video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients.

Liu KP, Li CH, Xue FS.

Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):735-6. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9943-5. Epub 2013 May 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
23657909
2.

Comparison of the Truview PCD™ and the GlideScope(®) video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial.

Riveros R, Sung W, Sessler DI, Sanchez IP, Mendoza ML, Mascha EJ, Niezgoda J.

Can J Anaesth. 2013 May;60(5):450-7. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9906-x. Epub 2013 Feb 23.

PMID:
23435693
3.

Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.

Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jan;27(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832d328d.

PMID:
19809328
4.

Comparison of the TruView infant EVO2 PCD™ and C-MAC video laryngoscopes with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways.

Mutlak H, Rolle U, Rosskopf W, Schalk R, Zacharowski K, Meininger D, Byhahn C.

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Jan;69(1):23-7. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(01)04.

5.

Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study.

Malik MA, O'Donoghue C, Carney J, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG.

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jan;102(1):128-34. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen342.

PMID:
19059923
6.

Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG.

Br J Anaesth. 2008 Nov;101(5):723-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen231. Epub 2008 Sep 9.

PMID:
18784069
7.

Use of the King Vision™ video laryngoscope to facilitate fibreoptic intubation in critical tracheal stenosis proves superior to the GlideScope®.

El-Tahan MR, Doyle DJ, Khidr AM, Abdulshafi M, Regal MA, Othman MS.

Can J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;61(2):213-4. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-0077-6. Epub 2013 Nov 12. No abstract available.

PMID:
24218194
8.

Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT.

Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9620-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1. Review.

9.

Cricoid pressure with the Truview Evo2™ laryngoscope improves the glottic view.

Kumar N, Behera D, Dali JS, Arya M, Gupta A.

Can J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;58(9):810-4. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9543-1. Epub 2011 Jun 21.

PMID:
21691934
10.

GlideScope videolaryngoscope reduces the incidence of erroneous esophageal intubation by novice laryngoscopists.

Hirabayashi Y, Otsuka Y, Seo N.

J Anesth. 2010 Apr;24(2):303-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0872-y. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

PMID:
20108005
11.

Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.

McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH, Flynn NM, Laffey JG.

Anaesthesia. 2010 May;65(5):483-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06307.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

12.

A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways - a pilot study.

Armstrong J, John J, Karsli C.

Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65(4):353-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06294.x. Erratum in: Anaesthesia. 2010 Jun;65(6):658.

13.

The difficult pediatric airway--a review of new devices for indirect laryngoscopy in children younger than two years of age.

Holm-Knudsen R.

Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Feb;21(2):98-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03487.x. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

PMID:
21159025
14.

A possible explanation for cricoid pressure to improve the laryngeal view with the Truview Evo2™ laryngoscope.

Xue FS, Yuan YJ, Liu JH.

Can J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;58(12):1146-7; author reply 1447-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9599-y. Epub 2011 Oct 5. No abstract available.

PMID:
21971744
15.

Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation.

Hsu HT, Chou SH, Wu PJ, Tseng KY, Kuo YW, Chou CY, Cheng KI.

Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):411-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07049.x. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

16.

Tracheal intubation following training with the GlideScope compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Ayoub CM, Kanazi GE, Al Alami A, Rameh C, El-Khatib MF.

Anaesthesia. 2010 Jul;65(7):674-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06335.x. Epub 2010 May 17.

17.

Endotracheal tube introducer-assisted intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope.

Conklin LD, Cox WS, Blank RS.

J Clin Anesth. 2010 Jun;22(4):303-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.08.004. No abstract available.

PMID:
20522366
18.

Comparison of the Cobalt Glidescope video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in simulated normal and difficult infant airways.

White M, Weale N, Nolan J, Sale S, Bayley G.

Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Nov;19(11):1108-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03123.x. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

PMID:
19659602
19.

A randomized comparison of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope to the standard laryngoscopy for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated easy and difficult infant airway scenarios.

Fonte M, Oulego-Erroz I, Nadkarni L, Sánchez-Santos L, Iglesias-Vásquez A, Rodríguez-Núñez A.

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 May;27(5):398-402. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318217b550.

PMID:
21494161
20.

Validation of a model of graded difficulty in Laerdal SimMan: functional comparisons between Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope and Airtraq.

Darshane S, Ali M, Dhandapani S, Charters P.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Mar;28(3):175-80. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328340c383.

PMID:
21088593

Supplemental Content

Support Center