Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 94

1.

Assisted reproductive technique increases the risk of placental polyp.

Baba T, Endo T, Ikeda K, Shimizu A, Morishita M, Kuno Y, Honnma H, Kiya T, Ishioka S, Saito T.

Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Jun;29(6):611-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2013.788636.

PMID:
23656393
2.

Uterine preservation surgery for placental polyp.

Hiraki K, Khan KN, Kitajima M, Fujishita A, Masuzaki H.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jan;40(1):89-95. doi: 10.1111/jog.12128. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

PMID:
23937267
3.

Selective transarterial embolization and hysteroscopic removal of a placental polyp with preservation of reproductive capacity.

Takeuchi K, Ichimura H, Masuda Y, Yamada T, Nakago S, Maruo T.

J Reprod Med. 2002 Aug;47(8):608-10.

PMID:
12216424
4.

Effect of chronic hypertension on assisted pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

Dayan N, Lanes A, Walker MC, Spitzer KA, Laskin CA.

Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr;105(4):1003-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.039. Epub 2015 Dec 12.

PMID:
26690007
5.

Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.

Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):922-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.049. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

PMID:
22763098
6.

Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S.

Fertil Steril. 2016 Jan;105(1):73-85.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Review.

PMID:
26453266
7.

Computed tomographic angiography in diagnosis and management of placental polyp with neovascularization.

Takeda A, Koyama K, Imoto S, Mori M, Sakai K, Nakamura H.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 May;281(5):823-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1161-6. Epub 2009 Jun 24.

PMID:
19554340
8.

Placental polyp with prominent neovascularization.

Takeda A, Koyama K, Imoto S, Mori M, Sakai K, Nakamura H.

Fertil Steril. 2010 Mar 1;93(4):1324-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.065. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

PMID:
19394597
9.

Pregnancy outcome of uterine arterial embolization followed by selective hysteroscopic removal of a placental polyp.

Takeuchi K, Sugimoto M, Kitao K, Yoshida S, Maruo T.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(1):22-5.

PMID:
17230284
10.

Placental weight in singleton pregnancies with and without assisted reproductive technology: a population study of 536,567 pregnancies.

Haavaldsen C, Tanbo T, Eskild A.

Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):576-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der428. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

PMID:
22184202
11.

A placental polyp arising from an exaggerated placental site.

Harada N, Nobuhara I, Haruta N, Kajimoto M.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Aug;37(8):1154-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01491.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

PMID:
21501326
12.

Choosing the optimal therapeutic strategy for placental polyps using power Doppler color scoring: Transarterial embolization followed by hysteroscopic resection or expectant management?

Mori M, Iwase A, Osuka S, Kondo M, Nakamura T, Nakahara T, Goto M, Kikkawa F.

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;55(4):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.12.016.

13.

Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China.

Yang X, Li Y, Li C, Zhang W.

Fertil Steril. 2014 Feb;101(2):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

PMID:
24269043
14.

Trends in Severe Maternal Morbidity After Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States, 2008-2012.

Martin AS, Monsour M, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ, Callaghan WM, Boulet SL.

Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):59-66. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001197.

PMID:
26646124
15.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies.

Caserta D, Bordi G, Stegagno M, Filippini F, Podagrosi M, Roselli D, Moscarini M.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.011. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

PMID:
24405729
16.

Clinical significance of pregnancies with succenturiate lobes of placenta.

Suzuki S, Igarashi M.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;277(4):299-301. Epub 2007 Oct 16.

PMID:
17938944
17.

Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother.

Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, von Düring V, Skjaerven R, Vatten LJ.

Hum Reprod. 2006 Sep;21(9):2353-8. Epub 2006 May 25.

PMID:
16728419
18.

Antenatal Hospitalizations Among Pregnancies Conceived With and Without Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Martin AS, Zhang Y, Crawford S, Boulet SL, McKane P, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ; States Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (SMART) Collaborative.

Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;127(5):941-50. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001392.

PMID:
27054936
19.
20.

Triplet pregnancy: is the mode of conception related to perinatal outcomes?

Fennessy KM, Doyle LW, Naud K, Reidy K, Umstad MP.

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;18(3):321-7. doi: 10.1017/thg.2015.27. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

PMID:
25926295

Supplemental Content

Support Center