Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 257

1.

Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.

Chen J, Baer T, Moore BC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):2910-20. doi: 10.1121/1.4799807.

PMID:
23654396
2.

Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.

Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1718-31. doi: 10.1121/1.4739441.

PMID:
22978899
3.

Effect of enhancement of spectral changes on speech intelligibility and clarity preferences for the hearing impaired.

Chen J, Baer T, Moore BC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr;131(4):2987-98. doi: 10.1121/1.3689556.

PMID:
22501075
4.

An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Healy EW, Yoho SE, Wang Y, Wang D.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):3029-38. doi: 10.1121/1.4820893.

5.

On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.

Suelzle D, Parsa V, Falk TH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):EL412-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4802186.

PMID:
23656102
6.

Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Parsa V, Scollie S, Glista D, Seelisch A.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):54-68. doi: 10.1177/1084713813480856.

7.

Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.

Qazi OU, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23396271
8.
9.

Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):1419-32. doi: 10.1121/1.4864786.

PMID:
24606279
10.

Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment.

Lovett R, Summerfield Q, Vickers D.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):377-84. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.769064. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

PMID:
23516964
11.

Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.

Phatak SA, Grant KW.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Aug;136(2):859-66. doi: 10.1121/1.4889863.

PMID:
25096119
12.

Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.

Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.

Hear Res. 2015 Sep;327:175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

PMID:
26232529
13.

An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.

Keidser G, Dillon H, Mejia J, Nguyen CV.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Nov;52(11):795-800. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.817688. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

PMID:
23957444
14.

The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3028-37. doi: 10.1121/1.3641407.

15.

Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.

Kidd G Jr, Mason CR, Best V, Swaminathan J.

Trends Hear. 2015 Jun 30;19. pii: 2331216515593385. doi: 10.1177/2331216515593385.

16.

The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).

Arweiler I, Buchholz JM, Dau T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jan;133(1):13-6. doi: 10.1121/1.4770249.

PMID:
23297878
17.

Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.

Ng EH, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):433-41. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

18.

An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.

Yook S, Nam KW, Kim H, Hong SH, Jang DP, Kim IY.

Artif Organs. 2015 Apr;39(4):361-8. doi: 10.1111/aor.12391. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

PMID:
25284135
19.

The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.

Koning R, Wouters J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2569-81. doi: 10.1121/1.4748965.

PMID:
23039450
20.

The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.

Smits C, Festen JM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):3004-15. doi: 10.1121/1.4798667.

PMID:
23654404

Supplemental Content

Support Center