Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 79

1.

Comparative performance of GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in children with immobilized cervical spine.

Cui XL, Xue FS, Cheng Y, Li RP.

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 May;29(5):690. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e4e94. No abstract available.

PMID:
23640156
2.

A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in children with immobilized cervical spine.

Vlatten A, Litz S, MacManus B, Launcelott S, Soder C.

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1317-20. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182768bde.

PMID:
23187989
3.

Simulation based training of airway management with Macintosh blade and Glidescope video laryngoscope.

Latif RK, Akca O.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Jan;77(1):1-3. No abstract available.

4.

Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial.

Wetsch WA, Spelten O, Hellmich M, Carlitscheck M, Padosch SA, Lier H, Böttiger BW, Hinkelbein J.

Resuscitation. 2012 Jun;83(6):740-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

PMID:
22155448
5.

Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios.

Kim HJ, Chung SP, Park IC, Cho J, Lee HS, Park YS.

Emerg Med J. 2008 May;25(5):279-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052803.

PMID:
18434462
6.

[A comparison of Airtraq™ laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in adult patients with immobilized cervical spine].

Amor M, Nabil S, Bensghir M, Moussaoui A, Kabbaj S, Kamili ND, Maazouzi W.

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013 May;32(5):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Apr 3. French.

PMID:
23561715
7.

Comparison of the GlideScope Videolaryngoscope to the standard Macintosh for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated child airway scenarios.

Rodriguez-Nunez A, Oulego-Erroz I, Perez-Gay L, Cortinas-Diaz J.

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Oct;26(10):726-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181f39b87.

PMID:
20881907
8.

A comparative trial of the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size.

Lee JH, Park YH, Byon HJ, Han WK, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim JT.

Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):176-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318292f0bf. Epub 2013 May 17.

PMID:
23687227
9.

Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.

Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jan;27(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832d328d.

PMID:
19809328
10.

Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.

Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Spelten O, Teschendorf P, Hellmich M, Genzwürker HV, Hinkelbein J.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;28(12):849-58. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834c7c7f.

PMID:
21986981
11.

Effects of cervical spine immobilization technique and laryngoscope blade selection on an unstable cervical spine in a cadaver model of intubation.

Gerling MC, Davis DP, Hamilton RS, Morris GF, Vilke GM, Garfin SR, Hayden SR.

Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Oct;36(4):293-300.

PMID:
11020675
12.

The GlideScope video laryngoscope.

Doyle DJ.

Anaesthesia. 2005 Apr;60(4):414-5. No abstract available.

13.

The GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscope can be useful in airway management of entrapped patients.

Nakstad AR, Sandberg M.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Nov;53(10):1257-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02094.x. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

PMID:
19681773
14.

The changing scope of difficult airway management.

Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Sandberg WS, Epstein RH.

Can J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;60(10):1022-4. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9999-2. Epub 2013 Jul 30. No abstract available.

PMID:
23897492
15.

Comparison of the KingVision video laryngoscope to the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation of patient with cervical spine immobilization using extrication collars.

Gawlowski P, Iskrzycki L.

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):657-658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.064. Epub 2016 Dec 28. No abstract available.

PMID:
28057379
16.
17.

[Use of a new video-laryngoscope (McGRATH MAC) in patients with a difficult airway].

Arai T, Saima S, Taguchi A, Iwabuchi Y, Sato S, Kase S, Okuda Y.

Masui. 2013 Sep;62(9):1135-8. Japanese.

PMID:
24063144
18.

Evaluation of the GlideScope for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation by a semi-rigid collar.

Bathory I, Frascarolo P, Kern C, Schoettker P.

Anaesthesia. 2009 Dec;64(12):1337-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06075.x.

19.

Comparison of the Truview PCD™ and the GlideScope(®) video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial.

Riveros R, Sung W, Sessler DI, Sanchez IP, Mendoza ML, Mascha EJ, Niezgoda J.

Can J Anaesth. 2013 May;60(5):450-7. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9906-x. Epub 2013 Feb 23.

PMID:
23435693
20.

[Airway management in a patient with immobilized cervical spine. Preclinical use of the McGrath video-laryngoscope].

Noppens RR, Möbus S, Werner C, Piepho T.

Anaesthesist. 2009 May;58(5):469-73. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1528-x. German.

PMID:
19384457

Supplemental Content

Support Center