Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 148

1.

Effects of spatial-memory decay and dual-task interference on perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions in the absence of online visual feedback.

Cheng KC, Pratt J, Maki BE.

Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Apr;32(2):328-42. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

PMID:
23635599
2.

Do aging and dual-tasking impair the capacity to store and retrieve visuospatial information needed to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions?

Cheng KC, Pratt J, Maki BE.

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 5;8(11):e79401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079401. eCollection 2013.

3.

Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Cheng KC, McKay SM, King EC, Maki BE.

Exp Brain Res. 2012 May;218(4):589-99. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3051-6. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

PMID:
22411582
4.

Does aging impair the capacity to use stored visuospatial information or online visual control to guide reach-to-grasp reactions evoked by unpredictable balance perturbation?

Cheng KC, McKay SM, King EC, Maki BE.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Nov;67(11):1238-45. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls116. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

PMID:
22511290
5.

Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?

Ghafouri M, McIlroy WE, Maki BE.

Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(4):532-6. Epub 2004 Feb 24.

PMID:
14985902
6.

The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

King EC, McKay SM, Cheng KC, Maki BE.

Exp Brain Res. 2010 Nov;207(1-2):105-18. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2434-9. Epub 2010 Oct 19.

7.

Does the "eyes lead the hand" principle apply to reach-to-grasp movements evoked by unexpected balance perturbations?

King EC, Lee TA, McKay SM, Scovil CY, Peters AL, Pratt J, Maki BE.

Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Apr;30(2):368-83. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

PMID:
21035219
8.

Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.

Gage WH, Zabjek KF, Hill SW, McIlroy WE.

Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(4):627-37. Epub 2007 May 9.

PMID:
17487477
9.

Stepping to recover balance in complex environments: is online visual control of the foot motion necessary or sufficient?

Scovil CY, Zettel JL, Maki BE.

Neurosci Lett. 2008 Nov 7;445(1):108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.062. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

PMID:
18771705
10.

Role of peripheral vision in rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions.

Akram SB, Miyasike-daSilva V, Van Ooteghem K, McIlroy WE.

Exp Brain Res. 2013 Sep;229(4):609-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3624-z. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

PMID:
23811736
11.

Influence of non-spatial working memory demands on reach-grasp responses to loss of balance: Effects of age and fall risk.

Westlake KP, Johnson BP, Creath RA, Neff RM, Rogers MW.

Gait Posture. 2016 Mar;45:51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

12.

Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Zettel JL, Holbeche A, McIlroy WE, Maki BE.

Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;165(3):392-401. Epub 2005 May 10.

PMID:
15883802
13.

Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.

Rand MK, Shimansky Y, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR.

Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jan;154(1):50-65. Epub 2003 Oct 3.

PMID:
14530893
14.

Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.

Prime SL, Marotta JJ.

Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(2):291-305. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3358-3. Epub 2012 Dec 13. Erratum in: Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(2):307.

PMID:
23239197
15.

Control of aperture closure initiation during reach-to-grasp movements under manipulations of visual feedback and trunk involvement in Parkinson's disease.

Rand MK, Lemay M, Squire LM, Shimansky YP, Stelmach GE.

Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(3):509-25. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2064-2. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

PMID:
19902195
16.

Gaze behavior governing balance recovery in an unfamiliar and complex environment.

Zettel JL, Scovil CY, McIlroy WE, Maki BE.

Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jul 18;422(3):207-12. Epub 2007 Jun 17.

PMID:
17611033
17.
18.

Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Bateni H, Zecevic A, McIlroy WE, Maki BE.

Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jul;157(1):49-58. Epub 2004 Feb 3.

PMID:
14758453
19.

Utilization of visual feedback of the hand according to target view availability in the online control of prehension movements.

Fukui T, Inui T.

Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Aug;32(4):580-95. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

PMID:
24054896
20.

Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Goble DJ, Brown SH.

Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):693-704. Epub 2007 Feb 13.

PMID:
17297548

Supplemental Content

Support Center