Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 182

1.

Ultrasonographic modification of Cormack Lehane classification for pre-anesthetic airway assessment.

Gupta D, Srirajakalidindi A, Ittiara B, Apple L, Toshniwal G, Haber H.

Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Oct;21(6):835-42.

PMID:
23634565
2.

Mallampati class, obesity, and a novel airway trajectory measurement to predict difficult laryngoscopy.

Lee SL, Hosford C, Lee QT, Parnes SM, Shapshay SM.

Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):161-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.24829. Epub 2014 Jul 17.

PMID:
25042696
3.

Ultrasonography - A viable tool for airway assessment.

Reddy PB, Punetha P, Chalam KS.

Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;60(11):807-813.

4.
5.

Airway difficulty in Mallampati 'class zero' patients: a prospective double-blind observational study.

Hegde HV, Prasad KC, Bhat MT, Hegde JS, Santhosh Mysore Cb, Yaliwal VG, Raghavendra Rao P.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jul;29(7):338-42. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283542407.

PMID:
22569026
6.
7.

A comparison of a fiberoptic stylet and a bougie as adjuncts to direct laryngoscopy in a manikin-simulated difficult airway.

Kovacs G, Law JA, McCrossin C, Vu M, Leblanc D, Gao J.

Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;50(6):676-85. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

PMID:
17681639
8.

A combination of the modified Mallampati score, thyromental distance, anatomical abnormality, and cervical mobility (M-TAC) predicts difficult laryngoscopy better than Mallampati classification.

Ambesh SP, Singh N, Rao PB, Gupta D, Singh PK, Singh U.

Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2013 Jun;51(2):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 21.

9.

Association between factors predicting and assessing the airway and use of intubating laryngeal mask airway.

Staikou C, Tsaroucha A, Paraskeva A, Fassoulaki A.

Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Feb;20(4):553-8.

PMID:
20394253
10.

Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading.

Ochroch EA, Hollander JE, Kush S, Shofer FS, Levitan RM.

Can J Anaesth. 1999 Oct;46(10):987-90.

PMID:
10522589
11.

A new practical classification of laryngeal view.

Cook TM.

Anaesthesia. 2000 Mar;55(3):274-9.

12.

View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade.

Achen B, Terblanche OC, Finucane BT.

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Sep;36(5):717-21.

13.

Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation.

Iohom G, Ronayne M, Cunningham AJ.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jan;20(1):31-6.

PMID:
12553386
14.

Poor visualization during direct laryngoscopy and high upper lip bite test score are predictors of difficult intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.

Tremblay MH, Williams S, Robitaille A, Drolet P.

Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1495-500, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b38f.

PMID:
18420866
15.
16.
17.

Risk factors assessment of the difficult airway: an italian survey of 1956 patients.

Cattano D, Panicucci E, Paolicchi A, Forfori F, Giunta F, Hagberg C.

Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1774-9, table of contents.

PMID:
15562070
18.

Evaluation of the reliability of preoperative descriptive airway assessment tests in prediction of the Cormack-Lehane score: A prospective randomized clinical study.

Selvi O, Kahraman T, Senturk O, Tulgar S, Serifsoy E, Ozer Z.

J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

PMID:
28183567
19.

Modified Mallampati test and thyromental distance as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in Thai patients.

Ittichaikulthol W, Chanpradub S, Amnoundetchakorn S, Arayajarernwong N, Wongkum W.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Jan;93(1):84-9.

PMID:
20196416
20.

Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation.

Kaplan MB, Hagberg CA, Ward DS, Brambrink A, Chhibber AK, Heidegger T, Lozada L, Ovassapian A, Parsons D, Ramsay J, Wilhelm W, Zwissler B, Gerig HJ, Hofstetter C, Karan S, Kreisler N, Pousman RM, Thierbach A, Wrobel M, Berci G.

J Clin Anesth. 2006 Aug;18(5):357-62.

PMID:
16905081

Supplemental Content

Support Center