Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Development and prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement-associated morphology in a paediatric and adolescent population: a CT study of 225 patients.

Monazzam S, Bomar JD, Dwek JR, Hosalkar HS, Pennock AT.

Bone Joint J. 2013 May;95-B(5):598-604. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30118.

PMID:
23632667
2.

Prevalence of radiographic parameters predisposing to femoroacetabular impingement in young asymptomatic Chinese and white subjects.

Van Houcke J, Yau WP, Yan CH, Huysse W, Dechamps H, Lau WH, Wong CS, Pattyn C, Audenaert EA.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 18;97(4):310-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01538.

3.

Prevalence and characteristics of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in 100 hips with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia: a case control study.

Ida T, Nakamura Y, Hagio T, Naito M.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Oct 10;9:93. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0093-4.

4.

Effect of changes in pelvic tilt on range of motion to impingement and radiographic parameters of acetabular morphologic characteristics.

Ross JR, Nepple JJ, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Larson CM, Bedi A.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2402-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541229.

PMID:
25060073
5.

Are cam and pincer deformities as common as dysplasia in Japanese patients with hip pain?

Mori R, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Nakashiro J, Fujii J, Terayama H, Ohshima S, Ochi M.

Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):172-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32680.

PMID:
24493180
6.

Variability of acetabular coverage between supine and weightbearing pelvic radiographs.

Pullen WM, Henebry A, Gaskill T.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2643-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546514548854.

PMID:
25214530
7.

Supine and Standing AP Pelvis Radiographs in the Evaluation of Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Jackson TJ, Estess AA, Adamson GJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1692-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4766-7.

PMID:
26913511
8.

Prevalence of Imaging Features on CT Thought to Be Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Retrospective Analysis of 473 Asymptomatic Adult Hip Joints.

Kim J, Choi JA, Lee E, Lee KR.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):W100-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13130.

PMID:
26102406
9.

Discrete mineralisation of the acetabular labrum: a novel marker of femoroacetabular impingement?

Cooke WR, Gill HS, Murray DW, Ostlere SJ.

Br J Radiol. 2013 Jan;86(1021):20120182. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120182.

10.

[The prevalence of reduced acetabular anteversion in asymptomatic patients: a retrospective analysis].

Hildebrand F, Shin HO, Flötotto L, Krettek C, Gerich T.

Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Dec;150(6):601-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327795. German.

PMID:
23296556
11.

Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control.

Hellman MD, Gross CE, Hart M, Freeman R, Salata MJ, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ.

Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar;32(3):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.035.

PMID:
26524938
12.

Anatomic features associated with femoroacetabular impingement are equally common in hips of old and young asymptomatic individuals without CT signs of osteoarthritis.

Omoumi P, Thiery C, Michoux N, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 May;202(5):1078-86. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10083.

PMID:
24660664
13.

Coxa profunda is not a useful radiographic parameter for diagnosing pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Nepple JJ, Lehmann CL, Ross JR, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 6;95(5):417-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01664.

PMID:
23467864
14.

Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: CT findings of features resembling femoroacetabular impingement in a young population without symptoms.

Chakraverty JK, Sullivan C, Gan C, Narayanaswamy S, Kamath S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb;200(2):389-95. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8546.

PMID:
23345362
15.

Quantifying the contribution of pincer deformity to femoro-acetabular impingement using 3D computerised tomography.

Dandachli W, Najefi A, Iranpour F, Lenihan J, Hart A, Cobb J.

Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Sep;41(10):1295-300. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1389-2.

PMID:
22426775
16.

CT-based morphological assessment of the hip joint in Japanese patients: association with radiographic predictors of femoroacetabular impingement.

Mineta K, Goto T, Wada K, Tamaki Y, Hamada D, Tonogai I, Higashino K, Sairyo K.

Bone Joint J. 2016 Sep;98-B(9):1167-74. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37267.

PMID:
27587515
17.

The three-dimensional relationship between acetabular rim morphology and the severity of femoral cam lesions.

Masjedi M, Nightingale CL, Azimi DY, Cobb JP.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Mar;95-B(3):314-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.30901.

PMID:
23450013
18.

CT assessment of asymptomatic hip joints for the background of femoroacetabular impingement morphology.

Ergen FB, Vudalı S, Sanverdi E, Dolgun A, Aydıngöz Ü.

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):271-6. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.13374.

19.

Characterization of symptomatic hip impingement in butterfly ice hockey goalies.

Ross JR, Bedi A, Stone RM, Sibilsky Enselman E, Kelly BT, Larson CM.

Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr;31(4):635-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.010.

PMID:
25498869
20.

Characterization of ossification of the posterior rim of acetabulum in the developing hip and its impact on the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Morris WZ, Chen JY, Cooperman DR, Liu RW.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 4;97(3):e11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00553.

PMID:
25653327

Supplemental Content

Support Center