Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 117

1.

The efficacy of glass-ceramic onlays in the restoration of morphologically compromised and endodontically treated molars.

Ozyoney G, Yan Koğlu F, Tağtekin D, Hayran O.

Int J Prosthodont. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):230-4. doi: 10.11607/ijp.2768.

PMID:
23626975
2.
3.

Two-year clinical evaluation of IPS Empress II ceramic onlays/inlays.

Tagtekin DA, Ozyöney G, Yanikoglu F.

Oper Dent. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):369-78. doi: 10.2341/08-97.

PMID:
19678440
4.

Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns.

Murgueitio R, Bernal G.

J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul;21(5):340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00837.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

PMID:
22372380
5.

IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.

Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A.

J Dent. 1999 Jul;27(5):325-31.

PMID:
10377606
6.

IPS Empress onlays luted with two dual-cured resin cements for endodontically treated teeth: a 3-year clinical evaluation.

Atali PY, Cakmakcioglu O, Topbasi B, Turkmen C, Suslen O.

Int J Prosthodont. 2011 Jan-Feb;24(1):40-2.

PMID:
21210001
7.

Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, LongXing N.

J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7.

PMID:
20105674
8.

Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.

Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N.

Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):459-65.

PMID:
11203857
9.
10.

Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years.

Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F, Petschelt A, Krämer N.

J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):393-8.

PMID:
19058686
11.

Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.

Coelho Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF.

Oper Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):123-30.

PMID:
15088722
12.

Fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored using ceramic onlays with or without fiber posts-an ex vivo study.

Keçeci AD, Heidemann D, Kurnaz S.

Dent Traumatol. 2016 Aug;32(4):328-35. doi: 10.1111/edt.12252. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

PMID:
26710085
13.
14.

Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.

Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF, Francischone CE, Rubo JH, Santos GC Jr.

Oper Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):3-11. doi: 10.2341/12-039-C. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

PMID:
22856680
15.

Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.

Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Giesinger JM, Dumfahrt H.

Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul-Aug;25(4):395-402.

PMID:
22720292
16.

Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays made with two systems: a one-year follow-up.

Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Francischone CE, Lauris JR, de Lima NM.

J Adhes Dent. 2004 Winter;6(4):333-8.

PMID:
15779320
17.

Long-term survival of endodontically treated, maxillary anterior teeth restored with either tapered or parallel-sided glass-fiber posts and full-ceramic crown coverage.

Signore A, Benedicenti S, Kaitsas V, Barone M, Angiero F, Ravera G.

J Dent. 2009 Feb;37(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

PMID:
19091452
18.

Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays.

Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Schärer P.

J Prosthodont. 1996 Dec;5(4):277-87.

PMID:
9171503
19.

The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.

Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.

Oper Dent. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):526-33. doi: 10.2341/07-132.

PMID:
18833859
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center