Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 115

1.

Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress.

Wolff HS, Fredrickson JR, Walker DL, Morbeck DE.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Jul;28(7):1776-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det102.

2.
3.

Mouse strain and quality control testing: improved sensitivity of the mouse embryo assay with embryos from outbred mice.

Khan Z, Wolff HS, Fredrickson JR, Walker DL, Daftary GS, Morbeck DE.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 1;99(3):847-854.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.10.046.

PMID:
23199609
4.

Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes.

Basile N, Morbeck D, García-Velasco J, Bronet F, Meseguer M.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):634-41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des462.

5.

Combined parental obesity negatively impacts preimplantation mouse embryo development, kinetics, morphology and metabolism.

Finger BJ, Harvey AJ, Green MP, Gardner DK.

Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2084-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev142.

6.

ART culture conditions change the probability of mouse embryo gestation through defined cellular and molecular responses.

Schwarzer C, Esteves TC, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Le Gac S, Nordhoff V, Schlatt S, Boiani M.

Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2627-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des223.

7.

Antioxidants improve mouse preimplantation embryo development and viability.

Truong TT, Soh YM, Gardner DK.

Hum Reprod. 2016 Jul;31(7):1445-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew098.

PMID:
27165621
8.

Similar morphokinetic patterns in embryos derived from obese and normoweight infertile women: a time-lapse study.

Bellver J, Mifsud A, Grau N, Privitera L, Meseguer M.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):794-800. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des438.

9.

Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study.

Kirkegaard K, Kesmodel US, Hindkjær JJ, Ingerslev HJ.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2643-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det300.

10.

Toxicity testing of human assisted reproduction devices using the mouse embryo assay.

Punt-van der Zalm JP, Hendriks JC, Westphal JR, Kremer JA, Teerenstra S, Wetzels AM.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Apr;18(4):529-35.

PMID:
19400995
11.

The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of  implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.

Basile N, Vime P, Florensa M, Aparicio Ruiz B, García Velasco JA, Remohí J, Meseguer M.

Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):276-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu331.

12.

Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles.

Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman LR, Austin C, Goldberg J, Falcone T.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Jun 20;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-54.

13.

Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.

Sundvall L, Ingerslev HJ, Breth Knudsen U, Kirkegaard K.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Dec;28(12):3215-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det366.

14.

High FSH decreases the developmental potential of mouse oocytes and resulting fertilized embryos, but does not influence offspring physiology and behavior in vitro or in vivo.

Li M, Zhao Y, Zhao CH, Yan J, Yan YL, Rong L, Liu P, Feng HL, Yu Y, Qiao J.

Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1309-23. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det014.

15.

Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation.

Dal Canto M, Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, De Ponti E, Novara PV, Brambillasca F, Comi R, Fadini R.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Nov;25(5):474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.016.

PMID:
22995750
16.

The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation.

Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsøe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohí J.

Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2658-71. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der256.

17.

Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group.

Ciray HN, Campbell A, Agerholm IE, Aguilar J, Chamayou S, Esbert M, Sayed S; Time-Lapse User Group..

Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2650-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu278.

18.

Assessing embryo quality by combining non-invasive markers: early time-lapse parameters reflect gene expression in associated cumulus cells.

Hammond ER, Stewart B, Peek JC, Shelling AN, Cree LM.

Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1850-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev121.

19.

Time-lapse analysis of mouse embryo development in oxygen gradients.

Wale PL, Gardner DK.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Sep;21(3):402-10. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.028.

PMID:
20691637
20.

Potential of inner cell mass outgrowth and amino acid turnover as markers of quality in the in vitro fertilization laboratory.

Gada RP, Daftary GS, Walker DL, Lacey JM, Matern D, Morbeck DE.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):863-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.012.

PMID:
22771026
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center