Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 89

1.

Patterned CoCrMo and Al2 O3 surfaces for reduced free wear debris in artificial joint arthroplasty.

Tarabolsi M, Klassen T, Mantwill F, Gärtner F, Siegel F, Schulz AP.

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Dec;101(12):3447-56. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34644.

PMID:
23595908
3.
4.

Bearing surfaces for total disc arthroplasty: metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene and other biomaterials.

Golish SR, Anderson PA.

Spine J. 2012 Aug;12(8):693-701. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.05.008. Review.

PMID:
21700505
5.
6.

Isolation and characterization of metallic wear debris from a dynamic intervertebral disc prosthesis.

Schmiedberg SK, Chang DH, Frondoza CG, Valdevit AD, Kostuik JP.

J Biomed Mater Res. 1994 Nov;28(11):1277-88.

PMID:
7829557
7.

Wear studies on the likely performance of CFR-PEEK/CoCrMo for use as artificial joint bearing materials.

Scholes SC, Unsworth A.

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Jan;20(1):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3558-3.

PMID:
18704647
8.
9.

Dynamic surface microstructural changes during tribological contact that determine the wear behaviour of hip prostheses: metals and ceramics.

Rainforth WM, Zeng P, Ma L, Valdez AN, Stewart T.

Faraday Discuss. 2012;156:41-57; discussion 87-103.

PMID:
23285621
10.

Alumina-alumina artificial hip joints. Part II: characterisation of the wear debris from in vitro hip joint simulations.

Tipper JL, Hatton A, Nevelos JE, Ingham E, Doyle C, Streicher R, Nevelos AB, Fisher J.

Biomaterials. 2002 Aug;23(16):3441-8.

PMID:
12099287
11.

Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.

Cunningham BW.

Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. Review.

PMID:
15541670
12.

Cementless total joint arthroplasty prostheses with titanium-alloy articular surfaces. A human retrieval analysis.

Nasser S, Campbell PA, Kilgus D, Kossovsky N, Amstutz HC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Dec;(261):171-85.

PMID:
2245543
13.

Does surface wettability influence the friction and wear of large-diameter CoCrMo alloy hip resurfacings?

Curran S, Hoskin T, Williams S, Scholes SC, Kinbrum A, Unsworth A.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 Aug;227(8):847-58. doi: 10.1177/0954411913488508.

PMID:
23852389
14.

Polyurethane unicondylar knee prostheses: simulator wear tests and lubrication studies.

Scholes SC, Unsworth A, Jones E.

Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jan 7;52(1):197-212.

PMID:
17183136
15.

Alternative bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty.

Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, DiCesare PE.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998 Jul-Aug;6(4):198-203. Review.

PMID:
9682082
16.

Modification of the frictional surfaces of artificial joints.

Nishimura I, Yuhta T, Ikubo K, Shimooka T, Murabayashi S, Mitamura Y.

ASAIO J. 1993 Jul-Sep;39(3):M762-6.

PMID:
8268641
17.

Wear properties of nano-Al2O3/UHMWPE composites irradiated by gamma ray against a CoCrMo alloy.

Xiong DS, Lin JM, Fan DL.

Biomed Mater. 2006 Sep;1(3):175-9. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/1/3/013.

PMID:
18458400
18.

The lexicon of polyethylene wear in artificial joints.

McKellop HA.

Biomaterials. 2007 Dec;28(34):5049-57.

PMID:
17706766
19.
20.

Macroscopic third-body wear caused by porous metal surface fragments in total hip arthroplasty.

Kleinhans JA, Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Heisel C, Kretzer JP.

Orthopedics. 2009 May;32(5):364.

PMID:
19472952

Supplemental Content

Support Center