Similar articles for PMID: 23595601

Year	Number of Results
2008	1
2012	2
2013	17
2014	14
2015	15
2016	19
2017	5
2018	7
2019	8
2020	2
2023	1
2024	0

1

Management of incidental findings in clinical genomic sequencing.

Krier JB, Green RC. Krier JB, et al. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2013;Chapter 9:Unit9.23. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0923s77. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2013. PMID: 23595601 Free PMC article.

2

Management of Incidental Findings in Clinical Genomic Sequencing.

Krier JB, Green RC. Krier JB, et al. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2015 Oct 6;87:9.23.1-9.23.16. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0923s87. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 26439717

3

Incidentalome from Genomic Sequencing: A Barrier to Personalized Medicine?

Jamuar SS, Kuan JL, Brett M, Tiang Z, Tan WL, Lim JY, Liew WK, Javed A, Liew WK, Law HY, Tan ES, Lai A, Ng I, Teo YY, Venkatesh B, Reversade B, Tan EC, Foo R. Jamuar SS, et al. EBioMedicine. 2016 Feb 4;5:211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.030. eCollection 2016 Mar. EBioMedicine. 2016. PMID: 27077130 Free PMC article.

4

Health outcomes, utility and costs of returning incidental results from genomic sequencing in a Canadian cancer population: protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial.

Shickh S, Clausen M, Mighton C, Gutierrez Salazar M, Zakoor KR, Kodida R, Reble E, Elser C, Eisen A, Panchal S, Aronson M, Graham T, Armel SR, Morel CF, Fattouh R, Glogowski E, Schrader KA, Hamilton JG, Offit K, Robson M, Carroll JC, Isaranuwatchai W, Kim RH, Lerner-Ellis J, Thorpe KE, Laupacis A, Bombard Y; Incidental Genomics Study Team. Shickh S, et al. BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031092. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31594892 Free PMC article.

5

Consideration of Cosegregation in the Pathogenicity Classification of Genomic Variants.

Jarvik GP, Browning BL. Jarvik GP, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1077-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 26. Am J Hum Genet. 2016. PMID: 27236918 Free PMC article.

6

Who's on first in exome and whole genome sequencing? Is it the patient or the incidental findings?

Rosenblatt DS. Rosenblatt DS. Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Sep-Oct;110(1-2):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 7. Mol Genet Metab. 2013. PMID: 23809103 No abstract available.

7

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.

Middleton A, Morley KI, Bragin E, Firth HV, Hurles ME, Wright CF, Parker M; DDD study. Middleton A, et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):21-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.58. Epub 2015 Apr 29. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016. PMID: 25920556 Free PMC article.

8

Attitudes towards Genetic Information Delivered by High-Throughput Sequencing among Molecular Geneticists, Genetic Counselors, Medical Advisors and Students in France.

Titerlea V, Dembélé D, Mandel JL, Laporte J. Titerlea V, et al. Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Apr;63(4):103770. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103770. Epub 2019 Sep 16. Eur J Med Genet. 2020. PMID: 31536829

9

Adolescents' preferences regarding disclosure of incidental findings in genomic sequencing that are not medically actionable in childhood.

Hufnagel SB, Martin LJ, Cassedy A, Hopkin RJ, Antommaria AH. Hufnagel SB, et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Aug;170(8):2083-8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37730. Epub 2016 May 5. Am J Med Genet A. 2016. PMID: 27149544

10

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.

Regier DA, Peacock SJ, Pataky R, van der Hoek K, Jarvik GP, Hoch J, Veenstra D. Regier DA, et al. CMAJ. 2015 Apr 7;187(6):E190-E197. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140697. Epub 2015 Mar 9. CMAJ. 2015. PMID: 25754703 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

76 results

Results by year