Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 203

1.

Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.

Dawes P, Hopkins R, Munro KJ.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):472-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.783718. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

PMID:
23594421
2.

Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.

Ng EH, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):433-41. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

3.

The placebo effect and the influence of participant expectation on hearing aid trials.

Dawes P, Powell S, Munro KJ.

Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):767-74. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182251a0e.

PMID:
21730857
4.

Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.

Ng EH, Classon E, Larsby B, Arlinger S, Lunner T, Rudner M, Rönnberg J.

Trends Hear. 2014 Nov 23;18. pii: 2331216514558688. doi: 10.1177/2331216514558688.

5.

On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.

Suelzle D, Parsa V, Falk TH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):EL412-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4802186.

PMID:
23656102
6.
7.

Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment.

Lovett R, Summerfield Q, Vickers D.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):377-84. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.769064. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

PMID:
23516964
8.

European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.

Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D, Fitzgerald O'Connor A, Frachet B, Frijns JH, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Marx M, Merkus P, Mylanus EA, Offeciers E, Pesch J, Ramos-Macias A, Robier A, Sterkers O, Uziel A.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Dec;52(12):838-48. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.802032. Epub 2013 Sep 2.

PMID:
23992489
9.

Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Kreisman BM, Mazevski AG, Schum DJ, Sockalingam R.

Trends Amplif. 2010 Mar;14(1):3-11. doi: 10.1177/1084713810364396. Epub 2010 May 10.

10.

Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief.

Shekhawat GS, Searchfield GD, Kobayashi K, Stinear CM.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Sep;52(9):617-25. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.799787. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

PMID:
23859059
11.

Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit.

Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Nov;52(11):789-94. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.802381. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

PMID:
23777478
12.

Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Parsa V, Scollie S, Glista D, Seelisch A.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):54-68. doi: 10.1177/1084713813480856.

13.

Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.

Moore BC, Sęk A.

Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):83-95. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182650adf.

PMID:
22878351
14.

Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.

Dawes P, Munro KJ, Kalluri S, Edwards B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jun;135(6):3560-9. doi: 10.1121/1.4874629.

PMID:
24907819
15.

Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.

Sabin AT, Souza PE.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Jun;17(2):94-107. doi: 10.1177/1084713813495981.

16.

Validation of the Chinese version "satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL)" survey for hearing-aid users.

Fang TY, Chang HJ, Wan TK, Wang PC, Chen YH.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):478-84. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.773406. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

PMID:
23514602
17.

An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.

Walravens E, Keidser G, Hartley D, Hickson L.

Int J Audiol. 2014 Feb;53 Suppl 1:S52-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.862599. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

PMID:
24447234
18.

Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.

Moore BC, Popelka GR.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Oct;52(10):678-86. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.809483. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

PMID:
23859058
19.

An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Healy EW, Yoho SE, Wang Y, Wang D.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):3029-38. doi: 10.1121/1.4820893.

20.

Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.

Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.

Hear Res. 2015 Sep;327:175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

PMID:
26232529

Supplemental Content

Support Center