Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 192

1.

Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.

Ryu WH, Kowalczyk I, Duggal N.

Spine J. 2013 Jun;13(6):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.046. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

PMID:
23578991
2.

Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.

Sasso RC, Best NM.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.

PMID:
18418131
3.

Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, Shin JH, Ju YS.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

4.

Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.

Hou Y, Liu Y, Yuan W, Wang X, Chen H, Yang L, Zhang Y.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

PMID:
24076441
5.

Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.

Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):721-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc.

PMID:
20543765
6.

Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.

Kowalczyk I, Lazaro BC, Fink M, Rabin D, Duggal N.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Dec;15(6):630-5. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11273. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

PMID:
21905776
7.

Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.

Powell JW, Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA, Hipp JA.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):89-95. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181991413.

PMID:
20051921
8.

Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.

Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

PMID:
25555050
9.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis.

Miao J, Yu F, Shen Y, He N, Kuang Y, Wang X, Chen D.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):878-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.439. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

PMID:
24095101
10.

Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.

Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC.

Eur Spine J. 2008 Jan;17(1):20-9. Epub 2007 Aug 25.

11.

In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.

Koller H, Meier O, Zenner J, Mayer M, Hitzl W.

Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):747-58. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2583-6. Epub 2012 Nov 24.

12.

Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis?

Walraevens JR, Liu B, Sloten JV, Demaerel P, Goffin J.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):372-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bccc69.

PMID:
20124918
13.

ProDisc-C: an in vivo kinematic study.

Duggal N, Bertagnoli R, Rabin D, Wharton N, Kowalczyk I.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):334-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181fbf8aa.

PMID:
21150671
14.

Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.

Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Hipp JA, Wharton ND, Anderson PA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):991-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182076d70.

PMID:
21358477
15.

X-Ray-based Kinematic Analysis of Cervical Spine According to Prosthesis Designs: Analysis of the Mobi C, Bryan, PCM, and Prestige LP.

Park SB, Kim KJ, Jin YJ, Kim HJ, Jahng TA, Chung CK.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Jun;28(5):E291-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318288a923.

PMID:
23429318
16.

Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.

Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 1;30(17):1949-54.

PMID:
16135984
17.

Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.

Kim SW, Paik SH, Castro PA, Baek SW, Shin DJ, Kwak YH, Ju YS.

Spine J. 2010 Aug;10(8):683-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.027. Epub 2010 May 26.

PMID:
20537960
18.

Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.

Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):393-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318150d121.

PMID:
18679092
19.

Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.

Lazaro BC, Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Kowalczyk I, Rabin D, Fink M, Duggal N.

Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Jun;28(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1058.

PMID:
20568921
20.

Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.

Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

PMID:
25036218

Supplemental Content

Support Center