Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 169

1.

Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature.

Jozwiak M, ten Eikelder M, Oude Rengerink K, de Groot C, Feitsma H, Spaanderman M, van Pampus M, de Leeuw JW, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp K; PROBAAT Study Group.

Am J Perinatol. 2014 Feb;31(2):145-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341573. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

PMID:
23564065
2.

Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Ten Eikelder ML, Neervoort F, Oude Rengerink K, van Baaren GJ, Jozwiak M, de Leeuw JW, de Graaf I, van Pampus MG, Franssen M, Oudijk M, van der Salm P, Woiski M, Pernet PJ, Feitsma AH, van Vliet H, Porath M, Roumen F, van Beek E, Versendaal H, Heres M, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Mar 19;13:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-67. Erratum in: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:183. van Baaren, Gert J [added].

3.

Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ten Eikelder ML, Mast K, van der Velden A, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BW.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Oct;71(10):620-630. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000361. Review.

PMID:
27770132
4.

Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):798-803. Review.

PMID:
10453829
5.

Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.

Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Ten Eikelder ML, van Pampus MG, Dijksterhuis MG, de Graaf IM, van der Post JA, van der Salm P, Scheepers HC, Schuitemaker N, de Leeuw JW, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Review.

PMID:
23870188
6.

Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.

Lanka S, Surapaneni T, Nirmalan PK.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jun;40(6):1527-33. doi: 10.1111/jog.12396.

PMID:
24888911
7.

Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.

Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):134-9.

PMID:
15814391
8.

Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, de Leeuw JW, de Graaf IM, van Pampus MG, Holswilder M, Oudijk MA, van Baaren GJ, Pernet PJ, Bax C, van Unnik GA, Martens G, Porath M, van Vliet H, Rijnders RJ, Feitsma AH, Roumen FJ, van Loon AJ, Versendaal H, Weinans MJ, Woiski M, van Beek E, Hermsen B, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW.

Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1619-28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00084-2. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

PMID:
26850983
9.

A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN Jr.

Am J Perinatol. 2009 Jan;26(1):33-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1091396. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

PMID:
18850516
10.

A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.

Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ.

Am J Perinatol. 2004 Apr;21(3):139-46.

PMID:
15085496
11.

Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M, van Beek E, Dijksterhuis MG, de Graaf IM, van Huizen ME, Oudijk MA, Papatsonis DN, Perquin DA, Porath M, van der Post JA, Rijnders RJ, Scheepers HC, Spaanderman ME, van Pampus MG, de Leeuw JW, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW; PROBAAT Study Group.

Lancet. 2011 Dec 17;378(9809):2095-103. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

PMID:
22030144
12.

A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.

Moraes Filho OB, Albuquerque RM, Cecatti JG.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Aug;89(8):1045-52. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499447.

PMID:
20636243
13.

Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Carbone JF, Tuuli MG, Fogertey PJ, Roehl KA, Macones GA.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):247-52. doi: http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827e5dca.

PMID:
23303106
14.

A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.

Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G.

Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):603-7.

PMID:
11275035
15.

Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction.

Chavakula PR, Benjamin SJ, Abraham A, Londhe V, Jeyaseelan V, Mathews JE.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 May;129(2):152-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

PMID:
25661322
16.

Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.

Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

PMID:
19034471
17.

Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Dällenbach P, Boulvain M, Viardot C, Irion O.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):162-7.

PMID:
12548212
18.

Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.

McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM.

BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):468-76. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12935. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Review.

19.

Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Boulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD001233. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD001233.

PMID:
11687101

Supplemental Content

Support Center