Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 259

1.

Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants.

Largent JA, Reisman NR, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Jewell ML.

Aesthet Surg J. 2013 May;33(4):529-39. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13484035. Epub 2013 Apr 4. Review.

PMID:
23559355
2.

Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.

Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Sep;66(9):1165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.046. Epub 2013 May 9. Review.

PMID:
23664574
3.

Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery.

Rocco N, Rispoli C, Moja L, Amato B, Iannone L, Testa S, Spano A, Catanuto G, Accurso A, Nava MB.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 16;(5):CD010895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010895.pub2. Review.

4.

Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.

Lista F, Tutino R, Khan A, Ahmad J.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):295-303. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958a6d.

PMID:
23584627
5.

Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel.

Stevens WG, Calobrace MB, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, Zeidler KR, d'Incelli RC.

Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Apr;36(4):404-16. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw015.

PMID:
26961987
6.

Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty.

Blount AL, Martin MD, Lineberry KD, Kettaneh N, Alfonso DR.

Aesthet Surg J. 2013 May;33(4):516-21. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13484465.

PMID:
23636624
7.

Risk Factor Analysis for Capsular Contracture, Malposition, and Late Seroma in Subjects Receiving Natrelle 410 Form-Stable Silicone Breast Implants.

McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002837.

8.
9.

Eight-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel.

Stevens WG, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, Broadway D, Zeidler K, Godinez TB.

Aesthet Surg J. 2015 May;35 Suppl 1:S3-10. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv020.

PMID:
25948657
10.

Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.

Doren EL, Pierpont YN, Shivers SC, Berger LH.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5):957-66. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001675.

PMID:
26505700
11.
12.

Natrelle Silicone Breast Implant Follow-Up Study: Demographics, Lifestyle, and Surgical Characteristics of More Than 50,000 Augmentation Subjects.

Singh N, Picha GJ, Murphy DK.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan;137(1):70-81. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001851.

13.

Two-year outcomes with a novel, double-lumen, saline-filled breast implant.

Nichter LS, Hamas RS.

Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Sep;32(7):861-7. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12455326.

PMID:
22942113
14.

Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years.

Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Bengtson BP.

Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Aug;32(6):709-17. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12452423. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

PMID:
22751081
15.

The In Vivo Pericapsular Tissue Response to Modern Polyurethane Breast Implants.

Frame J, Kamel D, Olivan M, Cintra H.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;39(5):713-23. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0550-4. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

PMID:
26304599
16.

Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study.

Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK.

Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Feb;35(2):145-55. doi: 10.1093/asj/sju084. Erratum in: Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Nov;35(8):1044.

17.

Five-Year Safety Data for More than 55,000 Subjects following Breast Implantation: Comparison of Rare Adverse Event Rates with Silicone Implants versus National Norms and Saline Implants.

Singh N, Picha GJ, Hardas B, Schumacher A, Murphy DK.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Oct;140(4):666-679. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003711.

PMID:
28953716
18.

Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.

Castello MF, Lazzeri D, Silvestri A, Agostini T, Pascone C, Marcelli C, Gigliotti D, D'Aniello C, Gasparotti M.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):828-38. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9704-1. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

PMID:
21455821
19.

Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years.

Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Maxwell GP; Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7 Suppl 1):40S-48S.

PMID:
18090813
20.

Commentary on: clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants.

Adams WP Jr.

Aesthet Surg J. 2013 May;33(4):540-3. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13484147. No abstract available.

PMID:
23636626

Supplemental Content

Support Center