Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 944

1.

Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.

Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.

Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23545628
2.

Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG, Lee S, Cho YM, Ahn H.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21612859
3.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749852
4.

Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.

Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O.

BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(7):991-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x. Epub 2009 May 5.

5.

[Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].

Otsuki H, Kuwahara Y, Nakamura K, Tsukamoto T.

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Sep;104(5):635-43. Japanese.

PMID:
24187850
6.

Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Geraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Joniau S, Van Kampen M.

BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):936-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.12258. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

7.

Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Ficarra V, Borghesi M, Suardi N, De Naeyer G, Novara G, Schatteman P, De Groote R, Carpentier P, Mottrie A.

BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):338-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12001. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

9.

How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.

Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Gallina A, Zaffuto E, Cucchiara V, Vizziello D, Shariat S, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

J Endourol. 2014 Jul;28(7):792-800. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0007. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

PMID:
24660774
10.

Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Ko WJ, Hruby GW, Turk AT, Landman J, Badani KK.

BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):451-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11393.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

11.

How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?

Punnen S, Meng MV, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Cowan JE, Carroll PR.

BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):E314-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11493.x. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

12.

Preoperative erectile function represents a significant predictor of postoperative urinary continence recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Gallina A, Capitanio U, Abdollah F, Salonia A, Nava L, Colombo R, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):569-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.034. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

PMID:
22177170
13.

Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.

Suardi N, Moschini M, Gallina A, Gandaglia G, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Bianchi M, Tutolo M, Passoni N, Salonia A, Hedlund P, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):717-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11315.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

14.

Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Berg KD, Thomsen FB, Hvarness H, Christensen IJ, Iversen P.

Scand J Urol. 2014 Aug;48(4):356-66. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.893534. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

PMID:
24579803
15.

Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients.

Ayyathurai R, Manoharan M, Nieder AM, Kava B, Soloway MS.

BJU Int. 2008 Apr;101(7):833-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07409.x. Epub 2008 Jan 10.

16.

Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon.

Patel VR, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Sivaraman A, Coughlin G.

BJU Int. 2010 Sep;106(5):696-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09541.x. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

17.

A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.

Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team.

BJU Int. 2003 Aug;92(3):205-10.

18.

Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, Manfredi M, Mele F, Grande S, Ragni F, Poggio M, Fiori C.

Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22840353
19.

Local steroid application during nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Deliveliotis C, Delis A, Papatsoris A, Antoniou N, Varkarakis IM.

BJU Int. 2005 Sep;96(4):533-5.

20.

Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.

Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, Gettman MT.

BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

Supplemental Content

Support Center