Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 227

1.

Changing values, changing outcomes: the influence of reprioritization response shift on outcome assessment after spine surgery.

Schwartz CE, Sajobi TT, Lix LM, Quaranto BR, Finkelstein JA.

Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2255-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0377-x.

PMID:
23519975
3.

Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.

Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau D, Adogwa O, Cheng JS, Anderson WN, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194.

PMID:
21962034
5.

Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.

Copay AG, Martin MM, Subach BR, Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Schuler TC, Berven S.

Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.027.

PMID:
20171937
6.

The relationship between preoperative general mental health and postoperative quality of life in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.

Asher R, Mason AE, Weiner J, Fessler RG.

Neurosurgery. 2015 Jun;76(6):672-9. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000695.

PMID:
25714515
7.

[The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].

Hrabálek L, Machác J, Vaverka M.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):417-23. Czech.

PMID:
19912707
8.

The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery.

Slover J, Abdu WA, Hanscom B, Weinstein JN.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Aug 1;31(17):1974-80.

PMID:
16924216
9.

Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.

Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY.

Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006.

PMID:
18201937
10.

Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.

Mendenhall SK, Parker SL, Adogwa O, Shau DN, Cheng J, Aaronson O, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):353-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826105a5.

PMID:
25247253
11.

Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Kim HJ, Lee JI, Kang KT, Chang BS, Lee CK, Ruscheweyh R, Kang SS, Yeom JS.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):193-200. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000699.

PMID:
25384051
12.

Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.

Parker SL, Adogwa O, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Anderson WN, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

Spine J. 2012 Dec;12(12):1122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.006.

PMID:
23158968
13.

Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.

DeVine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E, Fourney DR, Vaccaro A, Wang J, Andersson G.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de. Review.

PMID:
21897347
14.

Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.

Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Aaronson OS, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

Spine J. 2012 Mar;12(3):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.014.

PMID:
21937282
15.

Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.

Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Adogwa O, Anderson WN, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 May;16(5):471-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11842.

PMID:
22324801
16.

Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up.

Häkkinen A, Kautiainen H, Järvenpää S, Arkela-Kautiainen M, Ylinen J.

Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):347-52.

17.

MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.

Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D Jr, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L.

Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-6.

PMID:
16413443
18.

The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Kim HJ, Park JW, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS.

Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1546-54. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.36016.

PMID:
26530659
19.

Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy.

Chaichana KL, Mukherjee D, Adogwa O, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Feb;14(2):261-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE10190.

PMID:
21214315
20.

Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.

Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Bydon A, Cheng JS, Asher AL, McGirt MJ.

Spine J. 2013 May;13(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.017.

PMID:
23422730
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center