Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 135

1.

The measurement of the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices across scientific fields.

Crespo JA, Li Y, Ruiz-Castillo J.

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058727. Epub 2013 Mar 14. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2013;8(5). doi:10.1371/annotation/d7b4f0c9-8195-45de-bee5-a83a266857fc. Li, Yungrong [corrected to Li, Yunrong].

2.

On the fairness of using relative indicators for comparing citation performance in different disciplines.

Castellano C, Radicchi F.

Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Mar-Apr;57(2):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0014-0. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

PMID:
19333733
3.

Citation classics in main pain research journals.

Li Z, Wu FX, Yang LQ, Sun YM, Lu ZJ, Yu WF.

J Anesth. 2012 Feb;26(1):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1254-9. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

PMID:
22008797
4.

Citation classics in suicide and life threatening behavior: a research note.

Stack S.

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012 Dec;42(6):628-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00117.x. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

PMID:
22937813
5.

[Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].

Donato HM, De Oliveira CF.

Acta Med Port. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):225-34. Epub 2006 Sep 7. Review. Portuguese.

6.

Universality of citation distributions: toward an objective measure of scientific impact.

Radicchi F, Fortunato S, Castellano C.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 11;105(45):17268-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806977105. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

7.
8.
9.

[Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods].

Seglen PO.

Nord Med. 1989;104(12):331-5, 341. Norwegian.

PMID:
2594499
10.

Scientometric analysis of anthropology in the Republic of Croatia for the period of 1980-1996.

Bencetic Klaić Z, Klaić B.

Coll Antropol. 1997 Jun;21(1):301-18.

PMID:
9225525
11.

[The impact factor as an assessment criterion of scientific achievements--the right to equal chances].

Lehrl S.

Strahlenther Onkol. 1999 Apr;175(4):141-53. Review. German.

PMID:
10230456
12.

Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science.

Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L.

Biomed Digit Libr. 2006 Jun 29;3:7.

13.

Citation rates for experimental psychology articles published between 1950 and 2004: top-cited articles in behavioral cognitive psychology.

Cho KW, Tse CS, Neely JH.

Mem Cognit. 2012 Oct;40(7):1132-61. Erratum in: Mem Cognit. 2012 Oct;40(7) :1162.

PMID:
22618710
14.

[Use of citation analysis and other bibliometric methods in evaluation of the quality of research].

Seglen PO.

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Nov 10;109(31):3229-4. Norwegian. Erratum in: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1989 Dec 10;109(34-36):3648.

PMID:
2595690
15.

Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine.

Lustosa LA, Chalco ME, Borba Cde M, Higa AE, Almeida RM.

Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(5):314-7.

17.

Author self-citation in the general medicine literature.

Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW.

PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020885. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

19.

Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.

Björk BC, Solomon D.

BMC Med. 2012 Jul 17;10:73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.

20.

Rescaling citations of publications in physics.

Radicchi F, Castellano C.

Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Apr;83(4 Pt 2):046116. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

PMID:
21599249

Supplemental Content

Support Center