Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 195

1.

A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCore(™) and EchoTip(®) 22-gauge needle types.

Witt BL, Adler DG, Hilden K, Layfield LJ.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2013 Dec;41(12):1069-74. doi: 10.1002/dc.22971. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

PMID:
23513000
2.

A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.

Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S.

Endoscopy. 2016 Apr;48(4):339-49. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393354. Epub 2015 Nov 12. Review.

PMID:
26561917
3.

The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles.

Othman MO, Abdelfatah MM, Padilla O, Hussinat M, Elhanafi S, Eloliby M, Torabi A, Hakim N, Boman DA.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2017 May;45(5):426-432. doi: 10.1002/dc.23689. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

PMID:
28261978
4.

22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses.

Sterlacci W, Sioulas AD, Veits L, Gönüllü P, Schachschal G, Groth S, Anders M, Kontos CK, Topalidis T, Hinsch A, Vieth M, Rösch T, Denzer UW.

World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 21;22(39):8820-8830.

5.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.

Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9.

6.

Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.

Rong L, Kida M, Yamauchi H, Okuwaki K, Miyazawa S, Iwai T, Kikuchi H, Watanabe M, Imaizumi H, Koizumi W.

Dig Endosc. 2012 Sep;24(5):358-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01243.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

PMID:
22925290
7.

Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.

Yusuf TE, Ho S, Pavey DA, Michael H, Gress FG.

Endoscopy. 2009 May;41(5):445-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214643. Epub 2009 May 5. Erratum in: Endoscopy. 2009 Jun;41(6):509.

PMID:
19418399
8.

Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions.

Lee JH, Stewart J, Ross WA, Anandasabapathy S, Xiao L, Staerkel G.

Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Oct;54(10):2274-81. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0906-1. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

PMID:
19669880
9.

High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.

Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JB, Park DH, Zhang Z, Gu M, Lee JG, Chang KJ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

PMID:
23433596
10.

EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.

Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BG, Wang AY, Stelow EB, Shami VM.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2014 Sep;42(9):751-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.23116. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

PMID:
24550162
11.

Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.

Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi HJ, Choi MH, Kim DC, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH.

Endoscopy. 2014 Dec;46(12):1056-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377558. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

PMID:
25098611
12.

Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.

Suzuki R, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS, Hikichi T, Takagi T, Sato A, Sato M, Ikeda T, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Tasaki K, Obara K, Ohira H.

Dig Endosc. 2012 Nov;24(6):452-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01311.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

PMID:
23078439
13.

Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.

Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, Noda K, Chikugo T, Dote K, Takeyama Y, Das K, Yamao K, Kudo M.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;24(3):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05636.x. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

PMID:
19032453
14.

EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.

Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, Bingham R, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Gomez V, Wallace MB.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Dec;84(6):1034-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1405. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

PMID:
27018087
15.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.

Dwyer J, Pantanowitz L, Ohori NP, Pai RK, Vrbin C, Brand RE, Monaco SE.

Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Feb;124(2):110-21. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21623. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

16.

A pilot study of EUS-guided through-the-needle forceps biopsy (with video).

Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ, Yamamoto N, Mizuno S, Mohri D, Kogure H, Matsubara S, Tada M, Koike K.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.033. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

PMID:
26772889
17.

Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.

Gimeno-García AZ, Elwassief A, Paquin SC, Gariépy G, Sahai AV.

Dig Endosc. 2014 May;26(3):467-73.

PMID:
24877242
18.

Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial.

Kamata K, Kitano M, Yasukawa S, Kudo M, Chiba Y, Ogura T, Higuchi K, Fukutake N, Ashida R, Yamasaki T, Nebiki H, Hirose S, Hoki N, Asada M, Yazumi S, Takaoka M, Okazaki K, Matsuda F, Okabe Y, Yanagisawa A.

Endoscopy. 2016 Jul;48(7):632-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106294. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

PMID:
27129137
19.

25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy.

Mavrogenis G, Weynand B, Sibille A, Hassaini H, Deprez P, Gillain C, Warzée P.

Endosc Int Open. 2015 Feb;3(1):E63-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390889. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

20.

Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.

Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1392. Epub 2012 May 31.

Supplemental Content

Support Center