Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 80

1.

Erratum - Effect of ascorbic acid, ethanol and acetone on adhesion between the treated fiber posts and composite resin cores.

Khamverdi Z, Talebian R.

J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;5(1):73. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.73. Epub 2013 Feb 28. No abstract available.

2.

Effect of ascorbic acid, ethanol and acetone on adhesion between the treated fiber posts and composite resin cores.

Khamverdi Z, Talebian R.

J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 Nov;4(4):187-91. doi: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.187. Epub 2012 Nov 29. Erratum in: J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;5(1):73. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;5(1):73. Zahra, Khamverdi [corrected to Khamverdi, Zahra]; Reza, Talebian [corrected to Talebian, Reza].

3.

Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.

Yenisey M, Kulunk S.

J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jan;99(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60007-4.

PMID:
18182184
4.
5.

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.

Torres-Sánchez C, Montoya-Salazar V, Córdoba P, Vélez C, Guzmán-Duran A, Gutierrez-Pérez JL, Torres-Lagares D.

J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60352-2.

PMID:
23929374
6.

Durability of the bond between resin composite cores and prefabricated posts.

Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A.

Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(5):271-6. doi: 10.1080/00016350902938571.

PMID:
19412877
7.

Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.

Artopoulou II, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM.

J Prosthodont. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):172-9.

PMID:
16681499
8.

Influence of chemical surface treatments on adhesion of fiber posts to composite resin core materials.

Elsaka SE.

Dent Mater. 2013 May;29(5):550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

PMID:
23518246
10.

The effect of fiber dowel heights in resin composite cores on restoration failures of endodontically treated teeth.

Mekayarajjananonth T, Chitcharus N, Winkler S, Bogert MC.

J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(2):63-9. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.2.63.

PMID:
19400060
11.

Fracture resistance of composite resin cores with or without prefabricated posts over different substrates.

Queiroz VS, Pizi EC, Soares CJ, Macedo VC, Martins LR.

Gen Dent. 2011 Sep-Oct;59(5):e214-8.

PMID:
22313834
12.

Influence of ethanol drying on the bond between fiber posts and root canals: SEM analysis.

Poggio C, Chiesa M, Lombardini M, Dagna A.

Quintessence Int. 2011 Jan;42(1):e15-21.

PMID:
21206926
13.

Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts.

Purton DG, Payne JA.

Quintessence Int. 1996 Feb;27(2):93-7.

PMID:
9063218
14.

In vitro fracture resistance of copy-milled zirconia ceramic posts.

Beck N, Graef F, Wichmann M, Karl M.

J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60214-6.

PMID:
20105682
15.

Fracture strength of endodontically-treated teeth restored with post and cores and composite cores only.

Ozcan M, Valandro LF.

Oper Dent. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):429-36. doi: 10.2341/08-110.

PMID:
19678448
16.
17.

Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth.

Balkaya MC, Birdal IS.

J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):296-303. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60304-2.

PMID:
23684279
18.

The bond of different post materials to a resin composite cement and a resin composite core material.

Stewardson D, Shortall A, Marquis P.

Oper Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;37(6):E1-12. doi: 10.2341/11-409-L. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

PMID:
22856648
19.
20.

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.

Franco EB, Lins do Valle A, Pompéia Fraga de Almeida AL, Rubo JH, Pereira JR.

J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

PMID:
24161260

Supplemental Content

Support Center