Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 344

1.

Use of individual feedback during human gross anatomy course for enhancing professional behaviors in doctor of physical therapy students.

Youdas JW, Krause DA, Hellyer NJ, Rindflesch AB, Hollman JH.

Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;6(5):324-31. doi: 10.1002/ase.1356.

PMID:
23509010
2.

Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism.

Camp CL, Gregory JK, Lachman N, Chen LP, Juskewitch JE, Pawlina W.

Anat Sci Educ. 2010 Mar-Apr;3(2):64-72. doi: 10.1002/ase.142.

PMID:
20213851
3.

Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapy students in human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.

Wait KR, Cloud BA, Forster LA, Jones TM, Nokleby JJ, Wolfe CR, Youdas JW.

Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Nov-Dec;2(6):286-93. doi: 10.1002/ase.107.

PMID:
19764082
4.

Peer teaching among physical therapy students during human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.

Youdas JW, Hoffarth BL, Kohlwey SR, Kramer CM, Petro JL.

Anat Sci Educ. 2008 Sep-Oct;1(5):199-206. doi: 10.1002/ase.44.

PMID:
19177411
5.

Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy.

Wittich CM, Pawlina W, Drake RL, Szostek JH, Reed DA, Lachman N, McBride JM, Mandrekar JN, Beckman TJ.

Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;6(4):232-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.1329.

PMID:
23212713
6.

Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.

Huitt TW, Killins A, Brooks WS.

Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460.

PMID:
24799448
7.

Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy.

Spandorfer J, Puklus T, Rose V, Vahedi M, Collins L, Giordano C, Schmidt R, Braster C.

Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):144-52. doi: 10.1002/ase.1394.

PMID:
23959790
8.

Humanities in Gross Anatomy Project: a novel humanistic learning tool at Des Moines University.

Canby CA, Bush TA.

Anat Sci Educ. 2010 Mar-Apr;3(2):94-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.129.

PMID:
20143400
9.

"Safe Harbor": evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course.

Spampinato CM, Wittich CM, Beckman TJ, Cha SS, Pawlina W.

Anat Sci Educ. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):191-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.1395.

PMID:
24039220
10.

Fostering interprofessional teamwork in an academic medical center: Near-peer education for students during gross medical anatomy.

Shields RK, Pizzimenti MA, Dudley-Javoroski S, Schwinn DA.

Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/ase.1466.

PMID:
24888728
11.

Assessment outcomes: computerized instruction in a human gross anatomy course.

Bukowski EL.

J Allied Health. 2002 Fall;31(3):153-8.

PMID:
12227266
12.

Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course.

Bryan RE, Krych AJ, Carmichael SW, Viggiano TR, Pawlina W.

Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005 Sep;34(8):486-91.

13.

Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.

Nwachukwu C, Lachman N, Pawlina W.

Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):45-52. doi: 10.1002/ase.1458.

PMID:
24799441
14.

[The physical therapy undergraduate students' responses to the gross human anatomy subjects].

Anahara R, Kawashiro Y, Matsuno Y, Mori C, Kohno T.

Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2008 Sep;83(3):81-6. Japanese.

PMID:
18807947
15.

Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory.

Brueckner JK, MacPherson BR.

Eur J Dent Educ. 2004 May;8(2):72-7.

PMID:
15059083
16.

Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short "dissection experience" within a systemic anatomy course.

Larkin TA, McAndrew DJ.

Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;6(4):225-31. doi: 10.1002/ase.1323.

PMID:
23213067
17.

Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.

Marshak DW, Oakes J, Hsieh PH, Chuang AZ, Cleary LJ.

Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):438-44. doi: 10.1002/ase.1497.

PMID:
25358463
18.

Perceptions among occupational and physical therapy students of a nontraditional methodology for teaching laboratory gross anatomy.

Thomas KJ, Denham BE, Dinolfo JD.

Anat Sci Educ. 2011 Mar-Apr;4(2):71-7. doi: 10.1002/ase.208.

PMID:
21387566
19.

Computed tomography-enhanced anatomy course using enterprise visualization.

May H, Cohen H, Medlej B, Kornreich L, Peled N, Hershkovitz I.

Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;6(5):332-41. doi: 10.1002/ase.1340.

PMID:
23401203
20.

Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.

Durán CE, Bahena EN, Rodríguez Mde L, Baca GJ, Uresti AS, Elizondo-Omaña RE, López SG.

Anat Sci Educ. 2012 May-Jun;5(3):171-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.1269.

PMID:
22383124
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center