Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 320

1.

The impact of acellular dermal matrix on tissue expander/implant loss in breast reconstruction: an analysis of the tracking outcomes and operations in plastic surgery database.

Pannucci CJ, Antony AK, Wilkins EG.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f917.

PMID:
23508050
2.

Unilateral preoperative chest wall irradiation in bilateral tissue expander breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a prospective outcomes analysis.

Weichman KE, Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):921-7. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828659c1.

PMID:
23385983
3.

Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications.

Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):429-36. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90.

PMID:
20124828
4.

Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix.

Ibrahim AM, Shuster M, Koolen PG, Kim K, Taghinia AH, Sinno HH, Lee BT, Lin SJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):1057-66. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3beec.

PMID:
24165587
5.

Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.

Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):403e-410e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637.

PMID:
22030500
6.

The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.

Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1049-58. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2acb.

PMID:
22544088
7.

Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.

Sbitany H, Serletti JM.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c29e. Review.

PMID:
22094735
8.

Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center.

Selber JC, Wren JH, Garvey PB, Zhang H, Erickson C, Clemens MW, Butler CE.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul;136(1):10-20. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001327.

PMID:
26111310
9.

Impact and outcome of human acellular dermal matrix size for immediate and two-stage breast reconstruction.

Cayci C, Santner F, Jacobson SR.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):11-8. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829194eb.

PMID:
23806904
10.

The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study.

Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, Moore DH, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jun;129(6):901e-908e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ec447.

PMID:
22634688
11.

Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction.

Parks JW, Hammond SE, Walsh WA, Adams RL, Chandler RG, Luce EA.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Oct;130(4):739-46.

PMID:
23018685
12.

Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients.

Haynes DF, Kreithen JC.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):892-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000610.

PMID:
25347625
13.

Sterile "ready-to-use" AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.

Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Saadeh PB, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):725-36. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe35b.

PMID:
23783060
14.

Initial experience with the use of foetal/neonatal bovine acellular dermal collagen matrix (SurgiMend™) for tissue-expander breast reconstruction.

Ohkuma R, Buretta KJ, Mohan R, Rosson GD, Rad AN.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Sep;66(9):1195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

PMID:
23768943
15.

Uneventful versus Successful Reconstruction and Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices.

Qureshi AA, Broderick KP, Belz J, Funk S, Reaven N, Brandt KE, Tenenbaum MM, Margenthaler JA, Aft RL, Myckatyn TM.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug;138(2):173e-83e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002402.

PMID:
27465177
16.

Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up?

Clarke-Pearson EM, Lin AM, Hertl C, Austen WG, Colwell AS.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):1690-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002173.

PMID:
27219225
17.

Analysis of acellular dermal matrix integration and revascularization following tissue expander breast reconstruction in a clinically relevant large-animal model.

Garcia O Jr, Scott JR.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):741e-51e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865c6d.

PMID:
23629113
18.

An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes.

Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):178-88. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000366.

PMID:
25068318
19.

Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications.

Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Teo EH, Arriaga AF, Disa JJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun;125(6):1606-14. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb2a.

PMID:
20517083
20.

The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial.

McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5 Suppl 2):57S-66S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825f05b4.

Supplemental Content

Support Center