Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 160

1.

Genetic parameters for androstenone and skatole as indicators of boar taint and their relationship to production and litter size traits in Danish Landrace.

Strathe AB, Velander IH, Mark T, Kadarmideen HN.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Jun;91(6):2587-95. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6107. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

2.

Genetic relationship between boar taint compounds, human nose scores, and reproduction traits in pigs.

Mathur PK, ten Napel J, Crump RE, Mulder HA, Knol EF.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Sep;91(9):4080-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6478. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

3.

Analysis of the genetics of boar taint reveals both single SNPs and regional effects.

Rowe SJ, Karacaören B, de Koning DJ, Lukic B, Hastings-Clark N, Velander I, Haley CS, Archibald AL.

BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 3;15:424. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-424.

4.

Genetic parameters for male fertility and its relationship to skatole and androstenone in Danish Landrace boars.

Strathe AB, Velander IH, Mark T, Ostersen T, Hansen C, Kadarmideen HN.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;91(10):4659-68. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6454. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

5.

Revealing genetic relationships between compounds affecting boar taint and reproduction in pigs.

Grindflek E, Meuwissen TH, Aasmundstad T, Hamland H, Hansen MH, Nome T, Kent M, Torjesen P, Lien S.

J Anim Sci. 2011 Mar;89(3):680-92. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3290.

6.

Effect of faecal soiling on skatole and androstenone occurrence in organic entire male pigs.

Thomsen R, Edwards SA, Jensen BB, Rousing T, Sørensen JT.

Animal. 2015 Sep;9(9):1587-96. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115000798. Epub 2015 May 20.

PMID:
25990887
7.

Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs.

Haberland AM, Luther H, Hofer A, Tholen E, Simianer H, Lind B, Baes C.

Animal. 2014 Jan;8(1):11-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113001857. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

PMID:
24176119
8.

Genetic parameters for androstenone, skatole, indole, and human nose scores as measures of boar taint and their relationship with finishing traits.

Windig JJ, Mulder HA, Ten Napel J, Knol EF, Mathur PK, Crump RE.

J Anim Sci. 2012 Jul;90(7):2120-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4700. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

9.

Genetic relationships between measures of sexual development, boar taint, health, and aggressiveness in pigs.

Parois SP, Prunier A, Mercat MJ, Merlot E, Larzul C.

J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;93(8):3749-58. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8290.

10.

Strategic use of anti-GnRH vaccine allowing selection of breeding boars without adverse effects on reproductive or production performances.

Oliviero C, Ollila A, Andersson M, Heinonen M, Voutila L, Serenius T, Peltoniemi O.

Theriogenology. 2016 Feb;85(3):476-82. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Sep 21.

PMID:
26474682
11.

Large scale genome-wide association and LDLA mapping study identifies QTLs for boar taint and related sex steroids.

Grindflek E, Lien S, Hamland H, Hansen MH, Kent M, van Son M, Meuwissen TH.

BMC Genomics. 2011 Jul 13;12:362. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-362.

12.

Association between SNPs within candidate genes and compounds related to boar taint and reproduction.

Moe M, Lien S, Aasmundstad T, Meuwissen TH, Hansen MH, Bendixen C, Grindflek E.

BMC Genet. 2009 Jul 5;10:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-32.

13.

Prevalence of boar taint in commercial pigs from Spanish farms.

Borrisser-Pairó F, Panella-Riera N, Zammerini D, Olivares A, Garrido MD, Martínez B, Gil M, García-Regueiro JA, Oliver MA.

Meat Sci. 2016 Jan;111:177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

PMID:
26468980
14.

An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs.

Van den Broeke A, Aluwé M, Tuyttens FA, Ampe B, Vanhaecke L, Wauters J, Janssens S, Coussé A, Buys N, Millet S.

J Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;93(3):934-43. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8184.

15.

A human nose scoring system for boar taint and its relationship with androstenone and skatole.

Mathur PK, ten Napel J, Bloemhof S, Heres L, Knol EF, Mulder HA.

Meat Sci. 2012 Aug;91(4):414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.025. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

PMID:
22436660
16.

Genome-wide association scan and phased haplotype construction for quantitative trait loci affecting boar taint in three pig breeds.

Gregersen VR, Conley LN, Sørensen KK, Guldbrandtsen B, Velander IH, Bendixen C.

BMC Genomics. 2012 Jan 13;13:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-22.

17.

A performance test for boar taint compounds in live boars.

Baes C, Mattei S, Luther H, Ampuero S, Sidler X, Bee G, Spring P, Hofer A.

Animal. 2013 May;7(5):714-20. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002273. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

PMID:
23211445
18.

Detection of quantitative trait loci for androstenone, skatole and boar taint in a cross between Large White and Meishan pigs.

Lee GJ, Archibald AL, Law AS, Lloyd S, Wood J, Haley CS.

Anim Genet. 2005 Feb;36(1):14-22.

PMID:
15670126
19.

The effect of a c.-8G>T polymorphism on the expression of cytochrome b5A and boar taint in pigs.

Peacock J, Lou Y, Lundström K, Squires EJ.

Anim Genet. 2008 Feb;39(1):15-21. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

PMID:
18162105
20.

Efficiency of genomic prediction for boar taint reduction in Danish Landrace pigs.

Lukić B, Pong-Wong R, Rowe SJ, de Koning DJ, Velander I, Haley CS, Archibald AL, Woolliams JA.

Anim Genet. 2015 Dec;46(6):607-16. doi: 10.1111/age.12369. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center