Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Miniaturized robotic laparoscope-holder for rectopexy: first results of a prospective study.

Jarry J, Moreau Gaudry A, Long JA, Chipon E, Cinquin P, Faucheron JL.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Apr;23(4):351-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0233.

PMID:
23477369
2.

Early experience with robotic rectopexy.

Buchs NC, Pugin F, Ris F, Volonte F, Morel P, Roche B.

Int J Med Robot. 2013 Dec;9(4):e61-5. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1498.

PMID:
23776088
3.

First clinical experience in urologic surgery with a novel robotic lightweight laparoscope holder.

Long JA, Tostain J, Lanchon C, Voros S, Medici M, Descotes JL, Troccaz J, Cinquin P, Rambeaud JJ, Moreau-Gaudry A.

J Endourol. 2013 Jan;27(1):58-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0357.

PMID:
22834862
4.

Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.

Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Nov;50(11):1825-30.

5.

Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Perrenot C, Germain A, Scherrer ML, Ayav A, Brunaud L, Bresler L.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jul;56(7):909-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318289366e.

PMID:
23739199
6.

Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.

Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Klintrup K, Takala H, Vierimaa M, Ohtonen P, Mäkelä J.

Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Feb;18(2):151-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1042-7.

PMID:
23839795
7.

Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Villa F, Sanguinetti A, Boni M, Mariani E, Avenia N.

Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.359. Review.

8.

Long-term outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients.

Germain A, Perrenot C, Scherrer ML, Ayav C, Brunaud L, Ayav A, Bresler L.

Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;16(3):198-202. doi: 10.1111/codi.12513.

PMID:
24308488
9.

Development of miniaturized light endoscope-holder robot for laparoscopic surgery.

Long JA, Cinquin P, Troccaz J, Voros S, Berkelman P, Descotes JL, Letoublon C, Rambeaud JJ.

J Endourol. 2007 Aug;21(8):911-4.

PMID:
17867952
10.

Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis.

Ramage L, Georgiou P, Tekkis P, Tan E.

Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):381-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1320-7. Review.

PMID:
26041559
11.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.

Gómez Ruiz M, Parra IM, Palazuelos CM, Martín JA, Fernández CC, Diego JC, Fleitas MG.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):145-53. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000265.

PMID:
25489707
12.

Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation?

Mantoo S, Podevin J, Regenet N, Rigaud J, Lehur PA, Meurette G.

Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):e469-75. doi: 10.1111/codi.12251.

PMID:
23895633
13.

Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior?

Mehmood RK, Parker J, Bhuvimanian L, Qasem E, Mohammed AA, Zeeshan M, Grugel K, Carter P, Ahmed S.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Sep;29(9):1113-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1937-4.

PMID:
24965859
14.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases.

Franceschilli L, Varvaras D, Capuano I, Ciangola CI, Giorgi F, Boehm G, Gaspari AL, Sileri P.

Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Apr;19(4):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1255-4.

PMID:
25577276
15.

Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.

de Hoog DE, Heemskerk J, Nieman FH, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Bouvy ND.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Oct;24(10):1201-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0766-3.

16.
17.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results.

Sileri P, Franceschilli L, de Luca E, Lazzaro S, Angelucci GP, Fiaschetti V, Pasecenic C, Gaspari AL.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):622-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1793-2.

PMID:
22228202
18.

Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome.

Kairaluoma MV, Viljakka MT, Kellokumpu IH.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Mar;46(3):353-60.

PMID:
12626911
19.

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Heah SM, Hartley JE, Hurley J, Duthie GS, Monson JR.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 May;43(5):638-43.

PMID:
10826424
20.

Robot-assisted rectopexy is a safe and feasible option for treatment of rectal prolapse.

Haahr C, Jakobsen HL, Gögenur I.

Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):A4842.

PMID:
24814744
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center