Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 294

1.

Combined non-invasive functional and anatomical diagnostic work-up in clinical practice: the magnetic resonance and computed tomography in suspected coronary artery disease (MARCC) study.

Groothuis JG, Beek AM, Brinckman SL, Meijerink MR, van den Oever ML, Hofman MB, van Kuijk C, van Rossum AC.

Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(26):1990-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht077. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

PMID:
23475530
2.

Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.

Manka R, Paetsch I, Kozerke S, Moccetti M, Hoffmann R, Schroeder J, Reith S, Schnackenburg B, Gaemperli O, Wissmann L, Wyss CA, Kaufmann PA, Corti R, Boesiger P, Marx N, Lüscher TF, Jahnke C.

Eur Heart J. 2012 Aug;33(16):2016-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs170. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

PMID:
22677136
3.

Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.

Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Ferreira N, Sampaio F, Pires-Morais G, Santos L, Melica B, Rodrigues A, Braga P, Azevedo L, Teixeira M, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Nagel E, Gama V.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 12;61(10):1099-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

4.

CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.

Bettencourt N, Ferreira ND, Leite D, Carvalho M, Ferreira WDS, Schuster A, Chiribiri A, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Nagel E, Gama V.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;6(10):1062-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

5.

3D fusion of functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography coronary angiography: accuracy and added clinical value.

Donati OF, Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Kuehnel C, Hennemuth A, Wyss C, Azemaj N, Plass A, Kozerke S, Falk V, Leschka S, Stolzmann P.

Invest Radiol. 2011 May;46(5):331-40. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182056caf.

PMID:
21285891
6.

Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study.

Bettencourt N, Ferreira N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Sampaio F, Santos L, Melica B, Rodrigues A, Braga P, Teixeira M, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Portugal P, Gama V, Nagel E.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Sep;6(5):730-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000280. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

7.

Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.

Ebersberger U, Makowski MR, Schoepf UJ, Platz U, Schmidtler F, Rose J, Kessel A, Roth P, Antoni D, Schnackenburg B, Helmberger T, Rieber J, Hoffmann E, Leber AW.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;14(12):1174-80. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet074. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

PMID:
23907345
8.

Non-invasive diagnostic workup of patients with suspected stable angina by combined computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Kirschbaum SW, Nieman K, Springeling T, Weustink AC, Ramcharitar S, Mieghem Cv, Rossi A, Duckers E, Serruys PW, Boersma E, de Feyter PJ, van Geuns RJ.

Circ J. 2011;75(7):1678-84. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

9.

MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, Al-Saadi N, Sauer E, Huettle K, Schönberg SO, Luchner A, Strohm O, Ahlstrom H, Dill T, Hoebel N, Simor T; MR-IMPACT Investigators.

Eur Heart J. 2013 Mar;34(10):775-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs022. Epub 2012 Mar 4.

PMID:
22390914
10.

Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.

Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C, Pietila M, Teresinska A, Aguadé-Bruix S, Pizzi MN, Todiere G, Gimelli A, Schroeder S, Drosch T, Poddighe R, Casolo G, Anagnostopoulos C, Pugliese F, Rouzet F, Le Guludec D, Cappelli F, Valente S, Gensini GF, Zawaideh C, Capitanio S, Sambuceti G, Marsico F, Perrone Filardi P, Fernández-Golfín C, Rincón LM, Graner FP, de Graaf MA, Fiechter M, Stehli J, Gaemperli O, Reyes E, Nkomo S, Mäki M, Lorenzoni V, Turchetti G, Carpeggiani C, Marinelli M, Puzzuoli S, Mangione M, Marcheschi P, Mariani F, Giannessi D, Nekolla S, Lombardi M, Sicari R, Scholte AJ, Zamorano JL, Kaufmann PA, Underwood SR, Knuuti J; EVINCI Study Investigators.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3). pii: e002179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179.

11.

Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve.

Williams MC, Mirsadraee S, Dweck MR, Weir NW, Fletcher A, Lucatelli C, MacGillivray T, Golay SK, Cruden NL, Henriksen PA, Uren N, McKillop G, Lima JA, Reid JH, van Beek EJ, Patel D, Newby DE.

Eur Radiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):1114-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

12.

Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging.

Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, Sketch MH Jr, Behar V, Weinsaft J, Cawley P, Parker M, Elliott M, Judd RM, Kim RJ.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8):1630-8. Epub 2006 Mar 27.

13.

Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, Fieno DS, Germano G, Slomka P, Wong ND, Kang X, Rozanski A.

J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):74-82. Review.

14.

Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, Mueller S, Schweyer M, Koenig A, Schiele TM, Theisen K, Siebert U, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Klauss V.

Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1465-71. Epub 2006 May 23.

PMID:
16720685
15.

Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.

Ponte M, Bettencourt N, Pereira E, Ferreira ND, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Albuquerque A, Gama V, Nagel E.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Dec;30(8):1589-97. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0492-y. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

PMID:
25082645
16.

Computed tomography coronary angiography accuracy in women and men at low to intermediate risk of coronary artery disease.

Dharampal AS, Papadopoulou SL, Rossi A, Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Meijboom WB, Neefjes LA, Nieman K, Boersma E, de Feijter PJ, Krestin GP.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Nov;22(11):2415-23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2503-5. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

17.

Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.

Manka R, Wissmann L, Gebker R, Jogiya R, Motwani M, Frick M, Reinartz S, Schnackenburg B, Niemann M, Gotschy A, Kuhl C, Nagel E, Fleck E, Marx N, Luescher TF, Plein S, Kozerke S.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5). pii: e003061. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.003061.

18.

Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, Scheffel H, Wyss C, Stolzmann P, Donati O, Schnabl J, Falk V, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Cury RC.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(5):540-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.961250. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

19.

Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Pan J, Huang S, Lu Z, Li J, Wan Q, Zhang J, Gao C, Yang X, Wei M.

Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 15;115(10):1333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.039. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

PMID:
25796365
20.

Incremental value of adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance in coronary artery disease detection.

Pereira E, Bettencourt N, Ferreira N, Schuster A, Chiribiri A, Primo J, Teixeira M, Simões L, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Gama V, Nagel E.

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):4160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.114. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

PMID:
23948111

Supplemental Content

Support Center